Tools & Wizards About Us
sts.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

sts.in

IT Solutions | IT Outsourcing & Consulting Services - Synergy Technology Services

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

130 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

465 ms

sts.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sts.in homepage info - get ready to check Sts best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about sts.in

Synergy Technology Services is a leading provider of IT services, solutions and outsourcing, technology consulting, software development, enterprise applications development, support and maintenance, ...

Visit sts.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Sts.in page load time and found that the first response time was 130 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sts.in performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

61/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,000 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.058

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

84/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sts.in

130 ms

stspl.com

155 ms

www.stspl.com

634 ms

5a4a916490a73c3c48f5c448c7bcf751.css

90 ms

AvenirNextLTPro-Regular.otf

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sts.in, 80% (4 requests) were made to Stspl.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (634 ms) relates to the external source Stspl.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 47.9 kB (50%)

Content Size

96.5 kB

After Optimization

48.6 kB

  • HTML
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sts.in main page is 96.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 59.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 47.9 kB

  • Original 59.9 kB
  • After minification 59.7 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 11 B

  • Original 36.6 kB
  • After minification 36.6 kB
  • After compression 36.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sts.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

  • CSS

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sts. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

sts.in

sts.in

130 ms

stspl.com

stspl.com

155 ms

www.stspl.com

www.stspl.com

634 ms

5a4a916490a73c3c48f5c448c7bcf751.css

5a4a916490a73c3c48f5c448c7bcf751.css

90 ms

AvenirNextLTPro-Regular.otf

AvenirNextLTPro-Regular.otf

61 ms

Accessibility Review

sts.in accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

sts.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sts.in SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sts.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sts.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sts.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: