Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

studioagfor.com

Home | Studio AGFOR | Acustica | Ambiente | Formazione | Italia

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

57 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

60 ms

studioagfor.com screenshot

About Website

Visit studioagfor.com now to see the best up-to-date Studio AGFOR content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about studioagfor.com

Studio AGFOR - Consulenza per l'acustica, l'ambiente, il territorio e per la formazione

Visit studioagfor.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Studioagfor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

studioagfor.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

studioagfor

57 ms

minified.js

30 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

60 ms

polyfill.min.js

913 ms

thunderbolt-commons.01583709.bundle.min.js

50 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Studioagfor.com, 5% (1 request) were made to Info0348.wixsite.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Polyfill-fastly.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (913 ms) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 417.8 kB (54%)

Content Size

777.1 kB

After Optimization

359.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Studioagfor.com main page is 777.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 523.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 414.1 kB

  • Original 523.3 kB
  • After minification 521.7 kB
  • After compression 109.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 414.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.5 kB
  • After minification 2.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studio AGFOR images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 251.3 kB
  • After minification 251.3 kB
  • After compression 247.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (65%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studio AGFOR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

studioagfor.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

studioagfor.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

studioagfor.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    IT

  • Language Claimed

    IT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studioagfor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studioagfor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: