Tools & Wizards About Us
studiobrandcollective.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

studiobrandcollective.com

Houston Digital Marketing and Branding Agency

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

89 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

55 ms

studiobrandcollective.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Studiobrandcollective content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about studiobrandcollective.com

Studio Brand is a Houston digital marketing, branding agency and marketing firm, specializing marketing strategies, social media marketing, email marketing, website design, strategy implementation and...

Visit studiobrandcollective.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Studiobrandcollective.com page load time and found that the first response time was 89 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

studiobrandcollective.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

48/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value930 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.8 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.studiobrandcollective.com

89 ms

minified.js

33 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

31 ms

polyfill.min.js

731 ms

thunderbolt-commons.5f3ef9f8.bundle.min.js

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Studiobrandcollective.com, 34% (16 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 32% (15 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (811 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 729.8 kB (61%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

462.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Studiobrandcollective.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 856.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 679.6 kB

  • Original 856.7 kB
  • After minification 854.9 kB
  • After compression 177.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 679.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 31.7 kB
  • After minification 29.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studiobrandcollective images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 48.1 kB

  • Original 304.1 kB
  • After minification 304.1 kB
  • After compression 256.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (33%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studiobrandcollective. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.studiobrandcollective.com

www.studiobrandcollective.com

89 ms

minified.js

minified.js

33 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

31 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

731 ms

thunderbolt-commons.5f3ef9f8.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.5f3ef9f8.bundle.min.js

51 ms

main.055801ac.bundle.min.js

main.055801ac.bundle.min.js

50 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

48 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

50 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

51 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

53 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

52 ms

cfd922_6f369533e7ba4368b957c2f9de724f36f000.jpg

cfd922_6f369533e7ba4368b957c2f9de724f36f000.jpg

257 ms

cfd922_e9843fa2d36a43779b6d7f449151333a~mv2.jpg

cfd922_e9843fa2d36a43779b6d7f449151333a~mv2.jpg

532 ms

cfd922_655cd99eb7284f8abaeee57736006439~mv2.jpg

cfd922_655cd99eb7284f8abaeee57736006439~mv2.jpg

472 ms

cfd922_94b69849a0e341ffaf52f89ab8c871c6~mv2.jpg

cfd922_94b69849a0e341ffaf52f89ab8c871c6~mv2.jpg

451 ms

cfd922_96e4959aadb24c76a5ca8a007bb759d3~mv2.jpg

cfd922_96e4959aadb24c76a5ca8a007bb759d3~mv2.jpg

529 ms

cfd922_39df9013b1004022937af37fd230ba58~mv2.jpg

cfd922_39df9013b1004022937af37fd230ba58~mv2.jpg

452 ms

cfd922_da0c2e5f2cc846b3b1f5b9a5009ee1d3f000.jpg

cfd922_da0c2e5f2cc846b3b1f5b9a5009ee1d3f000.jpg

476 ms

cfd922_dcd88ae364484ed3a8acd21fc5af486b~mv2.jpg

cfd922_dcd88ae364484ed3a8acd21fc5af486b~mv2.jpg

676 ms

cfd922_af3fc65d82054d41a95ad85eab6acfb5.png

cfd922_af3fc65d82054d41a95ad85eab6acfb5.png

680 ms

cfd922_f8bc87f74ba4487193d003060f0d6fda~mv2.webp

cfd922_f8bc87f74ba4487193d003060f0d6fda~mv2.webp

660 ms

cfd922_f752e1bedbac42918c51c0a22d58487b~mv2.webp

cfd922_f752e1bedbac42918c51c0a22d58487b~mv2.webp

638 ms

cfd922_b74e712a5b734054b88e04d491bf799e~mv2.webp

cfd922_b74e712a5b734054b88e04d491bf799e~mv2.webp

735 ms

cfd922_9283a3046b4e4eda820a4f4d3dd540c5~mv2.webp

cfd922_9283a3046b4e4eda820a4f4d3dd540c5~mv2.webp

696 ms

cfd922_1df61e45e4b348679a4e67b8ddc5a448~mv2.webp

cfd922_1df61e45e4b348679a4e67b8ddc5a448~mv2.webp

792 ms

cfd922_31008582a9484e2cb92e12ef1b2387cf~mv2.webp

cfd922_31008582a9484e2cb92e12ef1b2387cf~mv2.webp

811 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

57 ms

yS165lxqGuDghyUMXeu6xT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

yS165lxqGuDghyUMXeu6xT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

34 ms

ZqlneECqpsd9SXlmAsD2Ez8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

ZqlneECqpsd9SXlmAsD2Ez8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

34 ms

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

34 ms

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

34 ms

96 ms

97 ms

93 ms

92 ms

91 ms

91 ms

129 ms

130 ms

128 ms

125 ms

125 ms

122 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

6 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

24 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

8 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

6 ms

Accessibility Review

studiobrandcollective.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

studiobrandcollective.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

studiobrandcollective.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studiobrandcollective.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studiobrandcollective.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

studiobrandcollective.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Studiobrandcollective. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: