4.2 sec in total
1 sec
2.9 sec
252 ms
Welcome to studiocfit.com homepage info - get ready to check Studio Cfit best content right away, or after learning these important things about studiocfit.com
Thanks for visiting Studio C Pilates, we're right here in the heart of Sausalito. You can book a class online or give us a call at 415-971-0889 Thank you
Visit studiocfit.comWe analyzed Studiocfit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
studiocfit.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
8/100
10%
Value5.4 s
21/100
25%
Value10.5 s
7/100
10%
Value1,620 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value14.7 s
8/100
10%
1017 ms
42 ms
16 ms
25 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 121 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (99 requests) were addressed to the original Studiocfit.com, 9% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Studiocfit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 178.2 kB (7%)
2.4 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Studiocfit.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studio Cfit images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 66.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 22.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Studiocfit.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 91 (89%)
102
11
The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studio Cfit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 74 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
studiocfit.com
1017 ms
css
42 ms
layerslider.css
16 ms
style.min.css
25 ms
styles.css
24 ms
qode-quick-links.min.css
24 ms
settings.css
27 ms
style.css
27 ms
font-awesome.min.css
29 ms
style.min.css
27 ms
style.css
28 ms
stylesheet.min.css
104 ms
print.css
31 ms
style_dynamic.css
32 ms
responsive.min.css
35 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
32 ms
js_composer.min.css
86 ms
custom_css.css
35 ms
all.css
131 ms
v4-shims.css
145 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
34 ms
greensock.js
82 ms
jquery.min.js
84 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
82 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
100 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
83 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
128 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
127 ms
index.js
125 ms
index.js
125 ms
default.min.js
135 ms
plugins.js
271 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
126 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js
127 ms
qode-quick-links.min.js
133 ms
qode-like.min.js
133 ms
core.min.js
134 ms
accordion.min.js
135 ms
menu.min.js
135 ms
api.js
80 ms
api.js
137 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
134 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
128 ms
dom-ready.min.js
119 ms
hooks.min.js
120 ms
i18n.min.js
120 ms
a11y.min.js
118 ms
autocomplete.min.js
118 ms
controlgroup.min.js
118 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
118 ms
button.min.js
118 ms
datepicker.min.js
241 ms
mouse.min.js
241 ms
resizable.min.js
241 ms
draggable.min.js
328 ms
dialog.min.js
328 ms
droppable.min.js
366 ms
progressbar.min.js
321 ms
selectable.min.js
320 ms
sortable.min.js
321 ms
slider.min.js
307 ms
spinner.min.js
306 ms
tooltip.min.js
283 ms
tabs.min.js
284 ms
effect.min.js
283 ms
effect-blind.min.js
285 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
285 ms
effect-clip.min.js
286 ms
effect-drop.min.js
286 ms
effect-explode.min.js
283 ms
effect-fade.min.js
281 ms
effect-fold.min.js
282 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
280 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
280 ms
effect-size.min.js
280 ms
effect-scale.min.js
282 ms
effect-shake.min.js
280 ms
effect-slide.min.js
282 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
280 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
282 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
280 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
280 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
279 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
290 ms
jquery.stretch.js
282 ms
1abd0b067ddd7f3f
279 ms
TweenLite.min.js
183 ms
smoothPageScroll.min.js
182 ms
default_dynamic.js
181 ms
custom_js.js
94 ms
comment-reply.min.js
93 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
90 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf
200 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf
263 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf
283 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf
282 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQ.ttf
281 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf
282 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf
283 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf
281 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf
310 ms
index.js
108 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDr0fJQ.ttf
310 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMDr0fJQ.ttf
310 ms
fa-v4compatibility.ttf
108 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
197 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
198 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
200 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
78 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
89 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
164 ms
StudioC-horizontal-trans-bg-399x65.png
83 ms
pixel-video.png
82 ms
sausalito.jpg
162 ms
easy-parking-1024x765-1.jpg
164 ms
studioCpilates1.jpg
223 ms
IMG_1671-1.jpg
238 ms
IMG_1488a.jpg
237 ms
XtpTm.png
237 ms
StudioC-w-white.png
219 ms
recaptcha__en.js
218 ms
studiocfit.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
studiocfit.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
studiocfit.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studiocfit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studiocfit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
studiocfit.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Studio Cfit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: