Tools & Wizards About Us
studioedit.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

studioedit.in

Graphic Design,Brochure Design in Bhubaneswar, Odisha

Page Load Speed

6.8 sec in total

First Response

904 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

604 ms

studioedit.in screenshot

About Website

Visit studioedit.in now to see the best up-to-date Studioedit content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about studioedit.in

Studioedit is one of the best professional Graphic designing Company in Bhubaneswar- Brochure Design services,Animated Video,Logo Design Services,Banner Design,Printing Services,catalogue Design,Book ...

Visit studioedit.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Studioedit.in page load time and found that the first response time was 904 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

studioedit.in performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.084

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

77/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

studioedit.in

904 ms

style.css

261 ms

styles.css

496 ms

css

50 ms

css

49 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Studioedit.in, 16% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Studioedit.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 80.5 kB (3%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Studioedit.in main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 21.3 kB

  • Original 26.3 kB
  • After minification 24.8 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 58.6 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studioedit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 130 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 577 B

  • Original 5.7 kB
  • After minification 5.7 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Studioedit.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (34%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

47

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studioedit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

studioedit.in

studioedit.in

904 ms

style.css

style.css

261 ms

styles.css

styles.css

496 ms

css

css

50 ms

css

css

49 ms

css

css

50 ms

slider.js

slider.js

480 ms

jquery-latest.min.js

jquery-latest.min.js

14 ms

css

css

50 ms

css

css

48 ms

css

css

47 ms

css

css

61 ms

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js

24 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.min.js

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.min.js

33 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

43 ms

script.js

script.js

504 ms

jssor.slider-26.2.0.min.js

jssor.slider-26.2.0.min.js

512 ms

css

css

16 ms

css

css

17 ms

css

css

18 ms

css

css

18 ms

css

css

19 ms

css

css

36 ms

logo.png

logo.png

252 ms

fb.png

fb.png

249 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

251 ms

gplus.png

gplus.png

240 ms

in.png

in.png

256 ms

pint.png

pint.png

483 ms

spin.svg

spin.svg

489 ms

banner10.jpg

banner10.jpg

1972 ms

banner15.jpg

banner15.jpg

1976 ms

banner11.jpg

banner11.jpg

759 ms

banner16.jpg

banner16.jpg

517 ms

banner6.jpg

banner6.jpg

1428 ms

underline.png

underline.png

740 ms

graphic.png

graphic.png

778 ms

website.png

website.png

990 ms

logoicon.png

logoicon.png

1016 ms

magazine.jpg

magazine.jpg

1284 ms

l4.jpg

l4.jpg

1975 ms

l6.jpg

l6.jpg

1783 ms

l1.png

l1.png

3316 ms

l2.jpg

l2.jpg

2136 ms

l9.jpg

l9.jpg

2332 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

2221 ms

logo2.png

logo2.png

2222 ms

logo3.jpg

logo3.jpg

2223 ms

logo4.jpg

logo4.jpg

2382 ms

logo5.jpg

logo5.jpg

2469 ms

logo6.png

logo6.png

2472 ms

logo7.png

logo7.png

2471 ms

logo8.jpg

logo8.jpg

2581 ms

logo9.jpg

logo9.jpg

2615 ms

logo10.jpg

logo10.jpg

2724 ms

logo11.png

logo11.png

2721 ms

logo12.png

logo12.png

2722 ms

logo13.png

logo13.png

2839 ms

logo14.png

logo14.png

2855 ms

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58a-xA.woff

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58a-xA.woff

51 ms

dg45_pLmvrkcOkBnKsOzXyGWTBcmg-X6VjvYIQ.woff

dg45_pLmvrkcOkBnKsOzXyGWTBcmg-X6VjvYIQ.woff

7 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

9 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

9 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

19 ms

1Pt2g8TAX_SGgBGUi0tGOYEga5WOwnsR.woff

1Pt2g8TAX_SGgBGUi0tGOYEga5WOwnsR.woff

20 ms

logo15.jpg

logo15.jpg

2740 ms

logo16.jpg

logo16.jpg

2726 ms

logo17.png

logo17.png

2733 ms

logo18.jpg

logo18.jpg

2852 ms

logo19.jpg

logo19.jpg

2845 ms

logo20.png

logo20.png

2755 ms

logo21.jpg

logo21.jpg

2742 ms

logo22.jpg

logo22.jpg

2713 ms

logo23.jpg

logo23.jpg

2594 ms

logo24.jpg

logo24.jpg

2597 ms

logo25.png

logo25.png

2703 ms

logo26.jpg

logo26.jpg

2485 ms

logo27.png

logo27.png

2720 ms

back1.jpg

back1.jpg

2542 ms

canvas.jpg

canvas.jpg

2378 ms

Accessibility Review

studioedit.in accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

studioedit.in best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

studioedit.in SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studioedit.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Studioedit.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

studioedit.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Studioedit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: