3.3 sec in total
319 ms
2.7 sec
282 ms
Welcome to studiomagonline.com homepage info - get ready to check Studiomagonline best content right away, or after learning these important things about studiomagonline.com
Naga169 terkenal dengan situs slot gacor menggunakan Qris anti ribet plus paling gampang untuk mendapatkan jackpot paus hari ini, daftarkan akun anda segera.
Visit studiomagonline.comWe analyzed Studiomagonline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 319 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
studiomagonline.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value3.2 s
91/100
10%
Value210 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.221
56/100
15%
Value6.9 s
54/100
10%
319 ms
474 ms
167 ms
413 ms
172 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Studiomagonline.com, 21% (18 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Studiomagonline.com.
Page size can be reduced by 394.2 kB (21%)
1.9 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Studiomagonline.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.3 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 62.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studiomagonline images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 294.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 294.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Studiomagonline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 61% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (28%)
79
57
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studiomagonline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
studiomagonline.com
319 ms
www.studiomagonline.com
474 ms
ccm.base.css
167 ms
jquery.js
413 ms
ccm.base.js
172 ms
style.css
182 ms
jquery.cycle.min.js
271 ms
view.css
262 ms
view.js
335 ms
view.css
333 ms
icd7vie.js
90 ms
widget.js
112 ms
buttons.js
73 ms
reset.css
347 ms
960.css
471 ms
main.css
472 ms
typography.css
506 ms
viewChannelModule.act
145 ms
glam_logo.js
214 ms
async-buttons.js
87 ms
ga.js
46 ms
STUDIO_logo_black-01.gif
163 ms
STUDIO_NEW_BANNER.jpg
465 ms
UK-Pub-233-Prod-SLVTN_Slide.jpg
883 ms
FOC_Slide.jpg
1043 ms
maxresdefault_Slide.jpg
340 ms
jumpside_Slide.jpg
1045 ms
Sister_Act_Slide.jpg
881 ms
cd2c3e21bf2ccd1886fe71ab192de6e9.jpg
503 ms
31b81c694b952a44be2ab72ad07db7a6.jpg
826 ms
789a0fd69f747a4d64ad1f3d270ae3e6.jpg
826 ms
244812ad5b530043a127398af6afebf3.jpg
986 ms
d23c998a19a391c9a31ef5e02560656c.jpg
959 ms
b15a915a262210402949ac410054eb0b.jpg
1042 ms
429df3165d0503c645d8f1b96ba7841e.jpg
1045 ms
37dc0b186c4eec974e8f9567244fd856.jpg
1135 ms
5b72ebc9f90597a233bd5d524640dffc.jpg
1136 ms
0968cbacc994b04cce8c73c9cc889538.jpg
1197 ms
a7b33f2b61f8cd01c9a469a613943287.jpg
1205 ms
fdc7a8cfc3e378788e2061542388f773.jpg
1205 ms
rss.png
1219 ms
twittertitle.png
1289 ms
tweet.png
1369 ms
facebook.png
1439 ms
portal-v2.html
137 ms
bg.png
1352 ms
widgets.js
136 ms
buttons-secure.css
71 ms
__utm.gif
30 ms
pview
105 ms
circle2.png
1186 ms
circle.png
1189 ms
widget_iframe.96fd96193cc66c3e11d4c5e4c7c7ec97.html
57 ms
sc
64 ms
settings
217 ms
moment~timeline~tweet.ae149926685a43cb146e35371430188e.js
6 ms
timeline.687eed636a16648c9f0b1f72d7fa68bd.js
10 ms
t.dhj
116 ms
profile
148 ms
t_.htm
5 ms
1f389.png
268 ms
1f497.png
299 ms
270c.png
299 ms
timeline.32f7f89e2e680ebfe3f4cfefb27966ae.light.ltr.css
16 ms
timeline.32f7f89e2e680ebfe3f4cfefb27966ae.light.ltr.css
46 ms
Rqi4qmgv_normal.jpeg
297 ms
YJ4vOls7_normal.jpg
318 ms
FvEgXi8S_normal.jpg
355 ms
JP89JKrq_normal.jpg
335 ms
CVFWHAOW4AA6fwl
379 ms
CVFOGgCWcAA2eL9
398 ms
CQ0IWsDWwAAhfCA
684 ms
CQ0Fvn9W8AALsGN
399 ms
CQfI3y5WIAAgd9M
398 ms
CQT0LnQWcAAIyUO
474 ms
CQTzUQnWwAAnSKK
400 ms
CIAwN4VWcAAvYU1
435 ms
CFm6CBsWMAAj9sm
497 ms
CFdhfaWWEAA1s3v
427 ms
CFSU75aWIAAvFy7
431 ms
CFR34iEWYAAPUgo
522 ms
CE9W9vdWgAAmBEj
456 ms
CE5yIL1WMAAlvn5
469 ms
index.html
13 ms
st.09d9c22728e9811b5c41ca57a50c04b8.js
18 ms
jot.html
9 ms
studiomagonline.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
studiomagonline.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
studiomagonline.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studiomagonline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studiomagonline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
studiomagonline.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Studiomagonline. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: