Tools & Wizards About Us
studiopottery.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

studiopottery.com

Welcome to the Pottery Studio

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

446 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

72 ms

studiopottery.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Studio Pottery content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about studiopottery.com

The Pottery Studio

Visit studiopottery.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Studiopottery.com page load time and found that the first response time was 446 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

studiopottery.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

studiopottery.com

446 ms

ppw.css

297 ms

feed.js

201 ms

rollers.js

202 ms

news.js

209 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Studiopottery.com, 84% (31 requests) were made to Potterystudio.co.uk and 3% (1 request) were made to Ws-eu.amazon-adsystem.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (575 ms) relates to the external source Potterystudio.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 13.0 kB (34%)

Content Size

38.3 kB

After Optimization

25.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Studiopottery.com main page is 38.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 16.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 9.7 kB

  • Original 14.4 kB
  • After minification 13.7 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 19 B

  • Original 16.8 kB
  • After minification 16.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studio Pottery images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 3.7 kB
  • After minification 2.9 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.5 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 793 B

  • Original 3.4 kB
  • After minification 3.4 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Studiopottery.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 793 B or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (66%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studio Pottery. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

studiopottery.com

studiopottery.com

446 ms

ppw.css

ppw.css

297 ms

feed.js

feed.js

201 ms

rollers.js

rollers.js

202 ms

news.js

news.js

209 ms

h1.gif

h1.gif

294 ms

1pix.gif

1pix.gif

201 ms

q

q

19 ms

cr7.jpg

cr7.jpg

97 ms

ps-bg.jpg

ps-bg.jpg

192 ms

h1.gif

h1.gif

192 ms

h2.gif

h2.gif

193 ms

1pix.gif

1pix.gif

194 ms

paper-bg.gif

paper-bg.gif

192 ms

dw_home.gif

dw_home.gif

193 ms

w_potters.gif

w_potters.gif

288 ms

w_potteries.gif

w_potteries.gif

289 ms

dw_pots.gif

dw_pots.gif

288 ms

w_id.gif

w_id.gif

290 ms

w_unid.gif

w_unid.gif

290 ms

w_info.gif

w_info.gif

290 ms

w_about.gif

w_about.gif

383 ms

w_arrivals.gif

w_arrivals.gif

384 ms

w_photos.gif

w_photos.gif

384 ms

w_assoc.gif

w_assoc.gif

385 ms

w_events.gif

w_events.gif

385 ms

w_gloss.gif

w_gloss.gif

387 ms

w_topten.gif

w_topten.gif

479 ms

w_workshop.gif

w_workshop.gif

479 ms

w_pinup.gif

w_pinup.gif

480 ms

w_breview.gif

w_breview.gif

480 ms

w_copy.gif

w_copy.gif

481 ms

w_ack.gif

w_ack.gif

484 ms

cr2.gif

cr2.gif

575 ms

brownpix.gif

brownpix.gif

574 ms

lcmicro.gif

lcmicro.gif

575 ms

ppw_print.css

ppw_print.css

97 ms

Accessibility Review

studiopottery.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

studiopottery.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

studiopottery.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studiopottery.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studiopottery.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

studiopottery.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Studio Pottery. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: