Tools & Wizards About Us
studioscreenings.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 58

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 25% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

studioscreenings.com

Ranked Highest in Variety’s – Small is Beautiful

Page Load Speed

371 ms in total

First Response

45 ms

Resources Loaded

326 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

studioscreenings.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Studioscreenings content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about studioscreenings.com

Wilshire Screening Room, The Best Small Room In Town, run by Michael S. Hall. Rate sheet and brochure available. Find out about Michael S. Hall and view photos of the screening room. Screening Service...

Visit studioscreenings.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Studioscreenings.com page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 326 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

studioscreenings.com performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

85/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

studioscreenings.com

45 ms

www.studioscreenings.com

235 ms

ssgroup2.css

9 ms

update.min.js

30 ms

20160817_06.jpg

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Studioscreenings.com, 11% (1 request) were made to Browser-update.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (235 ms) belongs to the original domain Studioscreenings.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 50.7 kB (21%)

Content Size

237.3 kB

After Optimization

186.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Studioscreenings.com main page is 237.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 229.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 7.2 kB
  • After minification 5.8 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.4 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 45.3 kB

  • Original 229.1 kB
  • After minification 183.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Studioscreenings needs image optimization as it can save up to 45.3 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 171 B

  • Original 988 B
  • After minification 988 B
  • After compression 817 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Studioscreenings.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 171 B or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studioscreenings. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

studioscreenings.com

studioscreenings.com

45 ms

www.studioscreenings.com

www.studioscreenings.com

235 ms

ssgroup2.css

ssgroup2.css

9 ms

update.min.js

update.min.js

30 ms

20160817_06.jpg

20160817_06.jpg

23 ms

1.300x225.jpg

1.300x225.jpg

20 ms

SSH_Logo_Homepage.png

SSH_Logo_Homepage.png

21 ms

inside%20theatre%203%20hi%20res_300x225.jpg

inside%20theatre%203%20hi%20res_300x225.jpg

21 ms

20200201_195138.jpg

20200201_195138.jpg

29 ms

Accessibility Review

studioscreenings.com accessibility score

58

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

studioscreenings.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

studioscreenings.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studioscreenings.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Studioscreenings.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

studioscreenings.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Studioscreenings. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: