2.7 sec in total
137 ms
2.3 sec
224 ms
Click here to check amazing Studiosight content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about studiosight.com
Studiosight delivers Web Design, SEO, Ads & Lead Gen to grow your brand fast. Book a free demo and start getting real, measurable results.
Visit studiosight.comWe analyzed Studiosight.com page load time and found that the first response time was 137 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
studiosight.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value24.6 s
0/100
25%
Value16.4 s
0/100
10%
Value3,850 ms
1/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value20.1 s
2/100
10%
137 ms
436 ms
76 ms
56 ms
113 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Studiosight.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 153.6 kB (30%)
509.2 kB
355.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Studiosight.com main page is 509.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 164.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 138.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studiosight images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Studiosight.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (76%)
63
15
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studiosight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
studiosight.com
137 ms
studiosight.com
436 ms
js
76 ms
frontend.min.css
56 ms
style.min.css
113 ms
ratesight-public.css
163 ms
font-awesome.min.css
224 ms
font-awesome-v4-shims.min.css
168 ms
basic.css
164 ms
grid.css
165 ms
theme-style.css
171 ms
elements.css
219 ms
responsive.css
222 ms
js_composer.min.css
337 ms
css
33 ms
jquery.min.js
333 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
226 ms
ratesight-public.js
272 ms
rbtools.min.js
432 ms
rs6.min.js
432 ms
modernizr.custom.js
279 ms
js
61 ms
rbtools.min.js
430 ms
rs6.min.js
457 ms
reviews-carousel.js
268 ms
fonts.css
445 ms
simple-line-icons.css
446 ms
rs6.css
456 ms
analyticswp.min.js
456 ms
comment-reply.min.js
456 ms
grve.min.js
456 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
456 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
511 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
509 ms
retina.min.js
509 ms
countUp.min.js
511 ms
fitvids.min.js
510 ms
jquery.appear.min.js
510 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
565 ms
stellar.min.js
562 ms
hoverdir.js
563 ms
WidgetJS.ashx
286 ms
js
86 ms
jquery.easypiechart.min.js
562 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
515 ms
smartresize.js
456 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
457 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
453 ms
main.js
457 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
450 ms
maps.js
446 ms
embed.js
69 ms
Logo_250px-Gray.png
214 ms
Logo_250px-White.png
269 ms
dummy.png
269 ms
ratesightlogostackedwhite-504x315.png
270 ms
RWRELogoWhite.png
270 ms
CCD-Smiles-logo_final_white-504x315.png
271 ms
monitor_Screen-Change-256.png
273 ms
credit-cards@2x.png
293 ms
font
44 ms
osmosis.woff
276 ms
shutterstock_215212042@2x.jpg
258 ms
shutterstock_136826882x2.jpg
222 ms
mix-manifest.json
21 ms
polyfill.min.js
1200 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.ttf
309 ms
studiosight.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
studiosight.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
studiosight.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studiosight.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studiosight.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
studiosight.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Studiosight. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: