Tools & Wizards About Us
studiosonogram.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

studiosonogram.com

Recording Studio Sonogram, Translation, Close Captioning, Laval

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

119 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

369 ms

studiosonogram.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Studio Sonogram content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about studiosonogram.com

Sonogram Studio, Recording Studios and Post Production Specialized in Subtitling and Multilingual Production Dedicated Virtual Reality in Laval, Montréal

Visit studiosonogram.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Studiosonogram.com page load time and found that the first response time was 119 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

studiosonogram.com performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.7 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,160 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.424

22/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.2 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

studiosonogram.com

119 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

35 ms

aqpb-view.css

59 ms

style.min.css

63 ms

styles.css

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Studiosonogram.com, 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (240 ms) belongs to the original domain Studiosonogram.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 149.3 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Studiosonogram.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 67.3 kB

  • Original 83.1 kB
  • After minification 72.2 kB
  • After compression 15.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.9 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 39.1 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studio Sonogram images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 35.9 kB

  • Original 540.3 kB
  • After minification 540.3 kB
  • After compression 504.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 71.7 kB
  • After minification 71.5 kB
  • After compression 64.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Studiosonogram.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (62%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studio Sonogram. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

studiosonogram.com

studiosonogram.com

119 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

35 ms

aqpb-view.css

aqpb-view.css

59 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

63 ms

styles.css

styles.css

60 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

67 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

72 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

58 ms

form-basic.min.css

form-basic.min.css

73 ms

cms-navigation-base.css

cms-navigation-base.css

74 ms

cms-navigation.css

cms-navigation.css

74 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

81 ms

simple-line-icons.css

simple-line-icons.css

75 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

75 ms

artcore.min.css

artcore.min.css

90 ms

style.css

style.css

94 ms

css

css

51 ms

css

css

52 ms

css

css

52 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

99 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

94 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

95 ms

app.js

app.js

122 ms

css

css

52 ms

aqpb-view.js

aqpb-view.js

100 ms

block-frontend-scripts.js

block-frontend-scripts.js

102 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

103 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

130 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

141 ms

api.js

api.js

65 ms

script.js

script.js

116 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

118 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

133 ms

custom.min.js

custom.min.js

130 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

132 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

133 ms

css

css

13 ms

css

css

13 ms

css

css

15 ms

artcore.css

artcore.css

58 ms

logo-sonogram-174x24.png

logo-sonogram-174x24.png

35 ms

en.png

en.png

32 ms

fr.png

fr.png

33 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

33 ms

IMG_1980-840x525.jpg

IMG_1980-840x525.jpg

73 ms

barbie.jpeg

barbie.jpeg

70 ms

gotham-840x525.jpg

gotham-840x525.jpg

76 ms

unnamed.jpg

unnamed.jpg

73 ms

Pokemon-840x525.jpg

Pokemon-840x525.jpg

73 ms

it-2.jpg

it-2.jpg

71 ms

Fast-and-Furious.jpg

Fast-and-Furious.jpg

73 ms

The-high-note-840x525.jpg

The-high-note-840x525.jpg

74 ms

ideas.jpg

ideas.jpg

146 ms

IMG_1980-75x75.jpg

IMG_1980-75x75.jpg

73 ms

barbie-75x75.jpeg

barbie-75x75.jpeg

75 ms

gotham-75x75.jpg

gotham-75x75.jpg

143 ms

unnamed-75x75.jpg

unnamed-75x75.jpg

144 ms

Pokemon-75x75.jpg

Pokemon-75x75.jpg

145 ms

it-2-75x75.jpg

it-2-75x75.jpg

145 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

68 ms

sonogram-studio-temoignages.jpg

sonogram-studio-temoignages.jpg

240 ms

font

font

112 ms

font

font

112 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

73 ms

font

font

192 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

174 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

66 ms

Accessibility Review

studiosonogram.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

studiosonogram.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studiosonogram.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studiosonogram.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

studiosonogram.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Studio Sonogram. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: