Tools & Wizards About Us
studymock.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

studymock.com

Studymock : A Learning Platform for Competitive Banking Exams

Page Load Speed

7.3 sec in total

First Response

662 ms

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

689 ms

studymock.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to studymock.com homepage info - get ready to check Studymock best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about studymock.com

Studymock : A Learning Platform for Competitive Banking Exams. Be Prepared with unlimited access of tests.

Visit studymock.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Studymock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 662 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

studymock.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.3 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.162

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.5 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

studymock.com

662 ms

studymock.com

1193 ms

js

108 ms

gtm.js

154 ms

js

189 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Studymock.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Admincp.studymock.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Studymock.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 98.5 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Studymock.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 799.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 78.4 kB

  • Original 86.5 kB
  • After minification 42.1 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 44.4 kB, which is 51% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.4 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 799.2 kB
  • After minification 789.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studymock images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 153.8 kB
  • After minification 153.8 kB
  • After compression 151.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 8.3 kB

  • Original 101.3 kB
  • After minification 101.3 kB
  • After compression 93.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Studymock.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (46%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studymock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

studymock.com

studymock.com

662 ms

studymock.com

studymock.com

1193 ms

js

js

108 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

154 ms

js

js

189 ms

icofont.min.css

icofont.min.css

288 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

567 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

796 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

816 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

839 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

847 ms

nice-select.css

nice-select.css

845 ms

apexcharts.css

apexcharts.css

844 ms

jqvmap.min.css

jqvmap.min.css

1056 ms

toastify.min.css

toastify.min.css

40 ms

style.css

style.css

1640 ms

firebase-app-compat.js

firebase-app-compat.js

36 ms

firebase-auth-compat.js

firebase-auth-compat.js

67 ms

modernizr-3.11.2.min.js

modernizr-3.11.2.min.js

1107 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

1120 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

1119 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1398 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

1578 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1386 ms

video-playlist.js

video-playlist.js

1399 ms

jquery.nice-select.min.js

jquery.nice-select.min.js

1396 ms

ajax-contact.js

ajax-contact.js

1764 ms

toastify-js

toastify-js

28 ms

main.js

main.js

1765 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

2237 ms

62b5598b3d84e1656052107.jpeg

62b5598b3d84e1656052107.jpeg

1735 ms

shape-1.png

shape-1.png

340 ms

shape-2.png

shape-2.png

339 ms

shape-3.png

shape-3.png

337 ms

shape-5.png

shape-5.png

339 ms

shape-6.png

shape-6.png

340 ms

shape-7.png

shape-7.png

526 ms

slider-1.png

slider-1.png

1079 ms

shape-9.png

shape-9.png

553 ms

author-01.jpg

author-01.jpg

828 ms

about.jpg

about.jpg

1701 ms

logo-icon2.svg

logo-icon2.svg

1308 ms

shape-15.png

shape-15.png

818 ms

shape-17.png

shape-17.png

829 ms

author-06.jpg

author-06.jpg

1099 ms

author-07.jpg

author-07.jpg

1107 ms

author-03.jpg

author-03.jpg

1108 ms

shape-13.svg

shape-13.svg

1343 ms

shape-22.png

shape-22.png

1379 ms

62b559596a3cf1656052057.jpeg

62b559596a3cf1656052057.jpeg

1994 ms

62b55930c2e561656052016.jpeg

62b55930c2e561656052016.jpeg

1760 ms

62b55903185631656051971.jpeg

62b55903185631656051971.jpeg

1762 ms

62b421343898e1655972148.jpeg

62b421343898e1655972148.jpeg

1763 ms

Gordita-Regular.woff

Gordita-Regular.woff

1619 ms

Gordita-Medium.woff

Gordita-Medium.woff

1620 ms

Gordita-Light.woff

Gordita-Light.woff

1492 ms

Gordita-Bold.woff

Gordita-Bold.woff

1534 ms

flaticon.ttf

flaticon.ttf

1580 ms

icofont.woff

icofont.woff

2283 ms

shape-4.png

shape-4.png

1805 ms

shape-11.png

shape-11.png

1862 ms

shape-18.png

shape-18.png

1859 ms

Accessibility Review

studymock.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

studymock.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

studymock.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studymock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studymock.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

studymock.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Studymock. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: