Tools & Wizards About Us
style64.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

style64.org

Style | we make demos, tools and toys for your Commodore Business Machine | (an NTSC/C64 demo group)

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

103 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

456 ms

style64.org screenshot

About Website

Visit style64.org now to see the best up-to-date Style 64 content for Turkey and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about style64.org

Online home for the North American/NTSC demo group Style; their releases for the C64, DTV v1, DTV v2, and PC; and their projects including DirMaster and Turbo Macro Pro.

Visit style64.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Style64.org page load time and found that the first response time was 103 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

style64.org performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.519

15/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

style64.org

103 ms

style64.org

142 ms

css_lQaZfjVpwP_oGNqdtWCSpJT1EMqXdMiU84ekLLxQnc4.css

33 ms

css_zkG2T5pRW6q20eM2IbNVge6Oub5_rTk1ywWpFXibv9I.css

61 ms

css_NCOSdpoQnWWQHVcfG2o2skDLf8YSjSAlOAadPoELzbo.css

89 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Style64.org, 24% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (526 ms) relates to the external source P.style64.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 64.8 kB (21%)

Content Size

310.3 kB

After Optimization

245.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Style64.org main page is 310.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 179.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 18.2 kB

  • Original 22.9 kB
  • After minification 18.1 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.8 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 36.2 kB

  • Original 179.6 kB
  • After minification 143.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Style 64 needs image optimization as it can save up to 36.2 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 80.8 kB
  • After minification 80.8 kB
  • After compression 70.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 10.3 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 144 B

  • Original 27.1 kB
  • After minification 27.1 kB
  • After compression 26.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Style64.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (40%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Style 64. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

style64.org

style64.org

103 ms

style64.org

style64.org

142 ms

css_lQaZfjVpwP_oGNqdtWCSpJT1EMqXdMiU84ekLLxQnc4.css

css_lQaZfjVpwP_oGNqdtWCSpJT1EMqXdMiU84ekLLxQnc4.css

33 ms

css_zkG2T5pRW6q20eM2IbNVge6Oub5_rTk1ywWpFXibv9I.css

css_zkG2T5pRW6q20eM2IbNVge6Oub5_rTk1ywWpFXibv9I.css

61 ms

css_NCOSdpoQnWWQHVcfG2o2skDLf8YSjSAlOAadPoELzbo.css

css_NCOSdpoQnWWQHVcfG2o2skDLf8YSjSAlOAadPoELzbo.css

89 ms

css_sz3oQG9JlITJh31TuUVWb_pyHl2PI7EjtZDPHZp0CuQ.css

css_sz3oQG9JlITJh31TuUVWb_pyHl2PI7EjtZDPHZp0CuQ.css

116 ms

js_EebRuRXFlkaf356V0T2K_8cnUVfCKesNTxdvvPSEhCM.js

js_EebRuRXFlkaf356V0T2K_8cnUVfCKesNTxdvvPSEhCM.js

141 ms

js_i9-mZxF1wrIj_pHo8CcygMfG3cz35Mlm6odAjzL19fk.js

js_i9-mZxF1wrIj_pHo8CcygMfG3cz35Mlm6odAjzL19fk.js

90 ms

js_v0XSAi9yevYQRhfQ8f7Sh_T9BUwlIsYQF193MTNQuAY.js

js_v0XSAi9yevYQRhfQ8f7Sh_T9BUwlIsYQF193MTNQuAY.js

115 ms

css

css

59 ms

js_MRdvkC2u4oGsp5wVxBG1pGV5NrCPW3mssHxIn6G9tGE.js

js_MRdvkC2u4oGsp5wVxBG1pGV5NrCPW3mssHxIn6G9tGE.js

90 ms

piwik.js

piwik.js

246 ms

style-the-suit.png

style-the-suit.png

90 ms

box_border.png

box_border.png

90 ms

dirmaster-v3.0.0--style_0.png

dirmaster-v3.0.0--style_0.png

151 ms

ccgmsx_v1.0.0.png

ccgmsx_v1.0.0.png

123 ms

c64-truetype-v1.0--style.thumbnail_0.png

c64-truetype-v1.0--style.thumbnail_0.png

90 ms

happy--style_0.png

happy--style_0.png

89 ms

tmp_oct06.png

tmp_oct06.png

203 ms

tmpx-v1.0--style_0.png

tmpx-v1.0--style_0.png

202 ms

line_border.png

line_border.png

202 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

88 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

122 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

149 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

137 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

136 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYySUhiCnAw.woff

186 ms

ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19K7Cwk6YvM.woff

ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-19K7Cwk6YvM.woff

187 ms

piwik.php

piwik.php

526 ms

Accessibility Review

style64.org accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

style64.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

style64.org SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Style64.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Style64.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

style64.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Style 64. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: