62.9 sec in total
3.5 sec
35.1 sec
24.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Style Agent content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about styleagent.net
Since 2005, we have helped thousands of real estate agents, teams, and brokerages to succeed and thrive online with our stylish real estate website design.
Visit styleagent.netWe analyzed Styleagent.net page load time and found that the first response time was 3.5 sec and then it took 59.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
styleagent.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.5 s
0/100
10%
Value18.3 s
0/100
25%
Value17.6 s
0/100
10%
Value2,000 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.744
6/100
15%
Value16.5 s
5/100
10%
3505 ms
2045 ms
1312 ms
1215 ms
1655 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Styleagent.net, 13% (11 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (14.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Styleagent.net.
Page size can be reduced by 3.6 MB (52%)
6.9 MB
3.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Styleagent.net main page is 6.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 83.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Style Agent images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.7 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.8 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Styleagent.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (67%)
73
24
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Style Agent. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.styleagent.net
3505 ms
analytics.js
2045 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1312 ms
datepicker3.css
1215 ms
settings.css
1655 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1587 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1951 ms
owl.carousel.css
1608 ms
magnific-popup.css
1586 ms
style.css
2319 ms
js_composer.min.css
2933 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1554 ms
css
1371 ms
frontend.js
2057 ms
jquery.js
2635 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
2103 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
2716 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
2681 ms
modernizr.js
2494 ms
css
1393 ms
css
1420 ms
css
2365 ms
css
2363 ms
font-awesome.min.css
2364 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
2365 ms
bootstrap-multiselect.js
2397 ms
wp-gallery-custom-links.js
2334 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2366 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
2367 ms
js
1358 ms
bootstrap.min.js
2366 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
4921 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
4921 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
4921 ms
parallax.min.js
4953 ms
placeholder-fallback.js
4952 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
4967 ms
jquery.counterup.js
4910 ms
waypoints.js
4896 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
4896 ms
main.js
4910 ms
collect
373 ms
logo.png
581 ms
logo-no-tagline.png
328 ms
slide-1.jpg
6442 ms
slide-2.jpg
6441 ms
slide-3.jpg
6185 ms
slide-4.jpg
9054 ms
12-anniversary-logo.png
8842 ms
homepage-portfolio-screenshot.png
9021 ms
features-three-quarter-custom-real-estate-websites.jpg
9545 ms
features-powered-by-wordpress.jpg
9022 ms
blog-mobile-responsive-design.jpg
12428 ms
sitecare-overview.jpg
14285 ms
footer-logo.png
13757 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
6194 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2786 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
8051 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
7557 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
12245 ms
H8_7oktkjVeeX06kbAvc0I3SmTH8Evs8V90CYwW3JLk.ttf
12245 ms
BYPM-GE291ZjIXBWrtCwetIZ6OFpBzzPr7LueGMiD8k.ttf
12245 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
12244 ms
collect
2492 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
7779 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
7571 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
7687 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
7564 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
11180 ms
common.js
167 ms
map.js
2022 ms
util.js
2021 ms
marker.js
5350 ms
infowindow.js
6104 ms
stats.js
4726 ms
onion.js
2101 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
5676 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
3662 ms
controls.js
1124 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
2971 ms
css
561 ms
transparent.png
1304 ms
styleagent.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
styleagent.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
styleagent.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Styleagent.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Styleagent.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
styleagent.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Style Agent. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: