6.8 sec in total
1.3 sec
4.7 sec
920 ms
Click here to check amazing Styleevent content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about styleevent.com
“They kept the energy alive like no band we had seen”EXPLOREW With the ability to blend best talent, we are known to be capable of getting even the most resistant crowds up dancing. Whether it's ...
Visit styleevent.comWe analyzed Styleevent.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
styleevent.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value16.5 s
0/100
10%
Value4,750 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.072
96/100
15%
Value29.4 s
0/100
10%
1252 ms
82 ms
218 ms
238 ms
254 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Styleevent.com, 9% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Styleevent.com.
Page size can be reduced by 365.9 kB (10%)
3.6 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Styleevent.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 147.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 147.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 207.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Styleevent images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 932 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Styleevent.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (64%)
94
34
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Styleevent. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.styleevent.com
1252 ms
js
82 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
218 ms
universal_video_background.css
238 ms
style.min.css
254 ms
styles.css
232 ms
font-awesome.min.css
240 ms
style.css
234 ms
js_composer.min.css
444 ms
style.css
461 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
433 ms
css
44 ms
vc_material.min.css
473 ms
css
28 ms
frontend.min.css
469 ms
icons.min.css
470 ms
jquery.js
644 ms
player.js
71 ms
universal_video_background.js
657 ms
css
39 ms
core.min.js
767 ms
widget.min.js
767 ms
position.min.js
768 ms
tooltip.min.js
770 ms
effect.min.js
900 ms
effect-drop.min.js
901 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
903 ms
index.js
899 ms
swiper.min.js
901 ms
main.js
902 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
1095 ms
wpfront-scroll-top.min.js
1093 ms
api.js
43 ms
index.js
1077 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1004 ms
frontend.min.js
1090 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
1090 ms
ProgressCircle.min.js
1221 ms
jquery.vc_chart.min.js
1271 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1294 ms
akismet-frontend.js
1299 ms
elfsight-instagram-feed.js
1425 ms
js
48 ms
analytics.js
15 ms
collect
11 ms
sddefault.jpg
153 ms
logo-300x50.png
468 ms
nav.png
640 ms
an_3731.jpg
639 ms
ov4.png
743 ms
Style-Events-wins-Couples-Choice-Award-uai-2064x554-2.jpg
921 ms
Original-.jpg
922 ms
overlay.png
954 ms
1.png
1101 ms
3.png
1101 ms
2.png
1164 ms
USE-in-color-.jpg
1342 ms
ov8.png
1343 ms
partyslate-featured-badge.png
1346 ms
cc.gif
1702 ms
go_logo.png
1657 ms
The-Kot-Hall-of-Fame-Badge-1200px-1022x1024-1.png
1687 ms
style-events-draft-revised-29-2.jpg
1687 ms
www.styleevent.com
1652 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf
66 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf
66 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDZbtY.ttf
133 ms
vc_material.ttf
834 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf
37 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf
163 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf
63 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf
162 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
746 ms
1-6.jpg
1969 ms
wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js
569 ms
wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js
574 ms
wp-polyfill-url.min.js
697 ms
wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js
670 ms
wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js
703 ms
recaptcha__en.js
117 ms
iframe_api
103 ms
carouselLeftNavOFF.png
243 ms
carouselRightNavOFF.png
242 ms
carouselLeftNavDisable.png
244 ms
carouselRightNavDisable.png
246 ms
anchor
61 ms
www-widgetapi.js
8 ms
JrSZPwo35xY
128 ms
styles__ltr.css
4 ms
recaptcha__en.js
10 ms
sLPIoIr_9R2H1vFE63bCW9_RmUPMbLk-XyKwDAco0G4.js
81 ms
webworker.js
80 ms
logo_48.png
67 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
32 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
33 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
32 ms
www-player.css
26 ms
www-embed-player.js
57 ms
base.js
88 ms
recaptcha__en.js
83 ms
ad_status.js
171 ms
6mt_jkCC8QEMfVv4UaXe0WVRezbgElH9_VSMBGBwk28.js
65 ms
embed.js
38 ms
id
19 ms
Create
111 ms
GenerateIT
16 ms
37.png
206 ms
styleevent.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
styleevent.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
styleevent.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Styleevent.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Styleevent.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
styleevent.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Styleevent. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: