11.4 sec in total
227 ms
10.8 sec
363 ms
Welcome to stylekick.com homepage info - get ready to check Stylekick best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about stylekick.com
Stylekick is a community dedicated to fashion inspiration. Browse through thousand of outfits in-app and shop the looks you love.
Visit stylekick.comWe analyzed Stylekick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 227 ms and then it took 11.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
stylekick.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value4.8 s
67/100
10%
Value160 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.042
99/100
15%
Value7.4 s
48/100
10%
227 ms
244 ms
27 ms
51 ms
115 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Stylekick.com, 71% (59 requests) were made to D14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net and 16% (13 requests) were made to S3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.6 sec) relates to the external source D14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (32%)
3.3 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Stylekick.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 120.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.7 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 88.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stylekick images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 797.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 797.2 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stylekick.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
68
68
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stylekick. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
www.stylekick.com
227 ms
gotham.css
244 ms
font-awesome.min.css
27 ms
main.css
51 ms
stylekick-logo-white-on-black.png
115 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
329 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
618 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
620 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
316 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
614 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
314 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
620 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
623 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
621 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
624 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
624 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
943 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
719 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1918 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
689 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
10602 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
871 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
872 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
941 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
987 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1465 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1109 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1374 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1178 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1424 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1583 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2026 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2006 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1916 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1867 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2057 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2057 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2243 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2337 ms
app-store-badge.png
74 ms
googlePlay_cmyk.png
80 ms
bagwhite.png
82 ms
eye.png
78 ms
bundle.js
347 ms
illu_chronique16_julia-sarr-jamois.jpeg
388 ms
gotham-bold.woff
299 ms
gotham-black.woff
298 ms
gotham-ultra.woff
298 ms
gotham-medium.woff
297 ms
gotham-book.woff
299 ms
gotham-light.woff
306 ms
gotham-xlight.woff
301 ms
gotham-thin.woff
298 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
39 ms
bg-pattern.png
264 ms
appLandingPage
131 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
collect
14 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1321 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1360 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1673 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1453 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1591 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1714 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1634 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1668 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1878 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1982 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
1910 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2092 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2093 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2047 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2277 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2132 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2139 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2220 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2249 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2245 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2269 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2286 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2129 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2143 ms
d14su9t9fbgko4.cloudfront.net
2061 ms
stylekick.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
stylekick.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
stylekick.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stylekick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Stylekick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
stylekick.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stylekick. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: