Tools & Wizards About Us
stylepaintingcorp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

stylepaintingcorp.com

Painting Company - Painting Contractor - Residential Painting, Commercial Painting

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

416 ms

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

902 ms

stylepaintingcorp.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Style Painting Corp content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stylepaintingcorp.com

Style Painting provides high quality painting services, exterior/interior painting, residential and commercial painting, paver sealing, pressure cleaning, roof cleaning, roof painting and more!

Visit stylepaintingcorp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stylepaintingcorp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 416 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stylepaintingcorp.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,630 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.stylepaintingcorp.com

416 ms

js

77 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

265 ms

a0obl.css

297 ms

63hyq.css

266 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Stylepaintingcorp.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Stylepaintingcorp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 276.0 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stylepaintingcorp.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 127.4 kB

  • Original 150.7 kB
  • After minification 143.1 kB
  • After compression 23.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 127.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 121.5 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Style Painting Corp needs image optimization as it can save up to 121.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 24.6 kB

  • Original 277.2 kB
  • After minification 277.2 kB
  • After compression 252.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 149.0 kB
  • After minification 149.0 kB
  • After compression 146.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stylepaintingcorp.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (76%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Style Painting Corp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.stylepaintingcorp.com

www.stylepaintingcorp.com

416 ms

js

js

77 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

265 ms

a0obl.css

a0obl.css

297 ms

63hyq.css

63hyq.css

266 ms

css

css

49 ms

all.css

all.css

45 ms

a0obl.css

a0obl.css

298 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

293 ms

a0obl.css

a0obl.css

302 ms

post-261.css

post-261.css

500 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

52 ms

css

css

67 ms

a0obl.js

a0obl.js

513 ms

a0obl.js

a0obl.js

515 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

301 ms

222005509571146

222005509571146

67 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

531 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

531 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

558 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

747 ms

bootstrap-select.min.js

bootstrap-select.min.js

756 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

760 ms

isotope.js

isotope.js

775 ms

owl.js

owl.js

774 ms

appear.js

appear.js

783 ms

wow.js

wow.js

995 ms

lazyload.js

lazyload.js

1001 ms

scrollbar.js

scrollbar.js

1012 ms

TweenMax.min.js

TweenMax.min.js

1019 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

1055 ms

script.js

script.js

1063 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

1238 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1243 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1257 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1260 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1266 ms

CerebriSans-Regular.ttf

CerebriSans-Regular.ttf

740 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

40 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

41 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

41 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

987 ms

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

fa-v4compatibility.ttf

931 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

956 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

1048 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

1128 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

1059 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

1176 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

1242 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

1229 ms

CerebriSans-Bold.ttf

CerebriSans-Bold.ttf

1293 ms

CerebriSans-Medium.ttf

CerebriSans-Medium.ttf

1308 ms

CerebriSans-ExtraBold.ttf

CerebriSans-ExtraBold.ttf

1376 ms

CerebriSans-Light.ttf

CerebriSans-Light.ttf

1428 ms

shape-2.jpg

shape-2.jpg

1474 ms

CerebriSans-SemiBold.ttf

CerebriSans-SemiBold.ttf

1444 ms

logo-1000.png

logo-1000.png

1471 ms

home-page-banner.jpg

home-page-banner.jpg

1319 ms

home-page-banner-02.jpg

home-page-banner-02.jpg

1389 ms

shape-1.png

shape-1.png

1443 ms

ext3.png

ext3.png

1508 ms

home-page-small-banner-02.jpg

home-page-small-banner-02.jpg

1507 ms

main.js

main.js

7 ms

Accessibility Review

stylepaintingcorp.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

stylepaintingcorp.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

stylepaintingcorp.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stylepaintingcorp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stylepaintingcorp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stylepaintingcorp.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Style Painting Corp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: