Tools & Wizards About Us
stylerow.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

stylerow.com

StyleRow for Interior Designers - Project Management and More - StyleRow

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

59 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

938 ms

stylerow.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to stylerow.com homepage info - get ready to check Style Row best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about stylerow.com

StyleRow features product clipping, internal and external communications, client approvals, invoicing and purchase orders, and more. It's a best-in-class platform that streamlines the project lif...

Visit stylerow.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stylerow.com page load time and found that the first response time was 59 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stylerow.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,510 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.082

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.0 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stylerow.com

59 ms

stylerow.com

56 ms

www.stylerow.com

1252 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

17 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Stylerow.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Stylerow.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 286.8 kB (7%)

Content Size

3.9 MB

After Optimization

3.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stylerow.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 116.4 kB

  • Original 138.1 kB
  • After minification 130.0 kB
  • After compression 21.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 158.9 kB

  • Original 3.4 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Style Row images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 266.8 kB
  • After minification 266.8 kB
  • After compression 261.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 112.5 kB
  • After minification 112.5 kB
  • After compression 105.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stylerow.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (61%)

Requests Now

88

After Optimization

34

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Style Row. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

stylerow.com

stylerow.com

59 ms

stylerow.com

stylerow.com

56 ms

www.stylerow.com

www.stylerow.com

1252 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

17 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

sbi-styles.min.css

28 ms

premium-addons.min.css

premium-addons.min.css

62 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

39 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

35 ms

styles.css

styles.css

34 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

35 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.css

jquery.bxslider.min.css

38 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

48 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

46 ms

wp-carousel-pro-public.min.css

wp-carousel-pro-public.min.css

46 ms

wp-video-popup.css

wp-video-popup.css

49 ms

style.css

style.css

53 ms

stylerow.css

stylerow.css

69 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

71 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

73 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

72 ms

post-1024.css

post-1024.css

76 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

76 ms

post-4843.css

post-4843.css

77 ms

css

css

25 ms

css

css

38 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

89 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

85 ms

jq-sticky-anything.min.js

jq-sticky-anything.min.js

86 ms

index.js

index.js

87 ms

stylerow.js

stylerow.js

85 ms

myfontswebfontskit.js

myfontswebfontskit.js

86 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

85 ms

stickThis.js

stickThis.js

85 ms

wp-video-popup.js

wp-video-popup.js

171 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

173 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

174 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

176 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

174 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

175 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

185 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

186 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

181 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

170 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

166 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

167 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

167 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

331 ms

mixpanel-2-latest.min.js

mixpanel-2-latest.min.js

260 ms

analytics.min.js

analytics.min.js

545 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

257 ms

792815200

792815200

484 ms

Logo.png

Logo.png

255 ms

stylerow-homepage-01-1.png

stylerow-homepage-01-1.png

261 ms

Header-Main-Image-1-2.png

Header-Main-Image-1-2.png

558 ms

icons-nodarkgray-04-1.png

icons-nodarkgray-04-1.png

253 ms

icons-nodarkgray-06-1.png

icons-nodarkgray-06-1.png

254 ms

icons-nodarkgray-07-1.png

icons-nodarkgray-07-1.png

253 ms

icons-nodarkgray-03-1.png

icons-nodarkgray-03-1.png

260 ms

icons-nodarkgray-05-1.png

icons-nodarkgray-05-1.png

259 ms

icons-nodarkgray-02-1-1.png

icons-nodarkgray-02-1-1.png

260 ms

Lead-Line-Down-Page.svg

Lead-Line-Down-Page.svg

259 ms

Group-2.png

Group-2.png

430 ms

Budgeting-Accounting-Shots.png

Budgeting-Accounting-Shots.png

366 ms

Invoice-Purchase-Orders-Shots.png

Invoice-Purchase-Orders-Shots.png

398 ms

Communication-Shots.png

Communication-Shots.png

428 ms

Client-Presentations-Shots.png

Client-Presentations-Shots.png

559 ms

Product-Clipper-shots.png

Product-Clipper-shots.png

429 ms

Katherine-Cowley-Testamonial-1.png

Katherine-Cowley-Testamonial-1.png

442 ms

Dan-Foley-Testamonial-2.png

Dan-Foley-Testamonial-2.png

440 ms

Krista-Tami-Tesstamonial-1.png

Krista-Tami-Tesstamonial-1.png

554 ms

Katherine-Cowley-Testamonial-1-1.png

Katherine-Cowley-Testamonial-1-1.png

487 ms

Dan-Foley-Testamonial-2-1.png

Dan-Foley-Testamonial-2-1.png

554 ms

Krista-Tami-Tesstamonial-1-1.png

Krista-Tami-Tesstamonial-1-1.png

486 ms

stylerow-homepage-01-3-2.png

stylerow-homepage-01-3-2.png

553 ms

logo-footer.svg

logo-footer.svg

550 ms

section_3_image.jpg

section_3_image.jpg

556 ms

JTUSjIg69CK48gW7PXoo9Wlhzg.ttf

JTUSjIg69CK48gW7PXoo9Wlhzg.ttf

154 ms

BebasNeueRegular.otf

BebasNeueRegular.otf

458 ms

BebasNeueBold.otf

BebasNeueBold.otf

474 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

244 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

276 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

287 ms

Lato-Reg.ttf

Lato-Reg.ttf

457 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

288 ms

Lato-Light.ttf

Lato-Light.ttf

495 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

286 ms

194 ms

js

js

111 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

151 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

143 ms

core.js

core.js

140 ms

destination

destination

146 ms

69255.js

69255.js

446 ms

fs.js

fs.js

144 ms

1663932813-b2a08448fff9d5f32efaf9206268995f6f82e33382fb87f618604401e5b52d19-d

1663932813-b2a08448fff9d5f32efaf9206268995f6f82e33382fb87f618604401e5b52d19-d

129 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

185 ms

collect

collect

61 ms

collect

collect

88 ms

js

js

54 ms

print.css

print.css

44 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

35 ms

Accessibility Review

stylerow.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

stylerow.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

stylerow.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stylerow.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stylerow.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

stylerow.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Style Row. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: