Tools & Wizards About Us
successive.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

successive.in

Digital Transformation Company - IT Services, Cloud, Consulting

Page Load Speed

7.1 sec in total

First Response

29 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

successive.in screenshot

About Website

Visit successive.in now to see the best up-to-date Successive content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about successive.in

Successive is a next-gen technology company offering services that include digital transformation, enterprise cloud, mobility, application security, and application development solutions.

Visit successive.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Successive.in page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

successive.in performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.1 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,140 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.236

53/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.6 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

successive.in

29 ms

successive.tech

2235 ms

2af961ec4f13ddd9593fd2b7788ad867.css

28 ms

jquery.js

24 ms

v2.js

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Successive.in, 90% (71 requests) were made to Successive.tech and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source Successive.tech.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 736.1 kB (17%)

Content Size

4.3 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Successive.in main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 119.6 kB

  • Original 151.1 kB
  • After minification 132.5 kB
  • After compression 31.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.6 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 615.0 kB

  • Original 3.9 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Successive needs image optimization as it can save up to 615.0 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 138.1 kB
  • After minification 138.1 kB
  • After compression 136.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 96.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (16%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

59

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Successive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

successive.in

successive.in

29 ms

successive.tech

successive.tech

2235 ms

2af961ec4f13ddd9593fd2b7788ad867.css

2af961ec4f13ddd9593fd2b7788ad867.css

28 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

24 ms

v2.js

v2.js

75 ms

lottie.min.js

lottie.min.js

73 ms

css2

css2

68 ms

jquery.custom-scrollbar.min.js

jquery.custom-scrollbar.min.js

121 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

16 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

14 ms

ScrollTrigger.min.js

ScrollTrigger.min.js

13 ms

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

120 ms

successive.js

successive.js

127 ms

hslider.js

hslider.js

243 ms

main.js

main.js

243 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

275 ms

SuccessiveDigitalLogo-DarkBG.png

SuccessiveDigitalLogo-DarkBG.png

177 ms

SuccessiveDigitalLogo-LightBG.png

SuccessiveDigitalLogo-LightBG.png

182 ms

arrow-red.svg

arrow-red.svg

192 ms

about-us.png

about-us.png

181 ms

Services.png

Services.png

183 ms

Cloud-Accelerators.png

Cloud-Accelerators.png

179 ms

industries.png

industries.png

212 ms

devops-2-1-768x480.jpg

devops-2-1-768x480.jpg

188 ms

Group-770770.png

Group-770770.png

1190 ms

about-us.webp

about-us.webp

1135 ms

services.webp

services.webp

557 ms

Vector-1.png

Vector-1.png

941 ms

cloud-accelerators.webp

cloud-accelerators.webp

635 ms

Mobile-Content-Management-150x94.png

Mobile-Content-Management-150x94.png

222 ms

Software-Development-Guide-150x94.png

Software-Development-Guide-150x94.png

251 ms

Payment-gateway-150x94.png

Payment-gateway-150x94.png

252 ms

about.webp

about.webp

1357 ms

UX-min.webp

UX-min.webp

865 ms

Advanced-data-min.webp

Advanced-data-min.webp

933 ms

customer-experince-min.webp

customer-experince-min.webp

1172 ms

telemedicine-min.webp

telemedicine-min.webp

1954 ms

service-slide-1.webp

service-slide-1.webp

1395 ms

Cloud.webp

Cloud.webp

1617 ms

Commerce.webp

Commerce.webp

2277 ms

CMS.webp

CMS.webp

1680 ms

Creative.webp

Creative.webp

1879 ms

aws.webp

aws.webp

1786 ms

Google-Cloud.webp

Google-Cloud.webp

1944 ms

awsparterner.webp

awsparterner.webp

2064 ms

Strapi.webp

Strapi.webp

2110 ms

Adobe-logo-1.png

Adobe-logo-1.png

1890 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

181 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

205 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

243 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

214 ms

Contentful.png

Contentful.png

1891 ms

Storyblok.png

Storyblok.png

1784 ms

acquia.png

acquia.png

1796 ms

BigCommerce.webp

BigCommerce.webp

2799 ms

svgviewer-png-output.png

svgviewer-png-output.png

1795 ms

gordita-bold-webfont.woff

gordita-bold-webfont.woff

2065 ms

gordita-medium-webfont.woff

gordita-medium-webfont.woff

2112 ms

gordita-regular-webfont.woff

gordita-regular-webfont.woff

1898 ms

Micro_Focus_logo.svg.png

Micro_Focus_logo.svg.png

1922 ms

download.png

download.png

1922 ms

digital-healthcare-min.png

digital-healthcare-min.png

1924 ms

Maritime-Transformation-min.png

Maritime-Transformation-min.png

1913 ms

Transforming-Agriculture.webp

Transforming-Agriculture.webp

2387 ms

lakeshore.png

lakeshore.png

1912 ms

Payment-Solution.webp

Payment-Solution.webp

2210 ms

payment-min-1.png

payment-min-1.png

1998 ms

Untitled-2.png

Untitled-2.png

1709 ms

industriesagri-min.png

industriesagri-min.png

1646 ms

Logistics-Distribution.png

Logistics-Distribution.png

1429 ms

Media-and-Communication.png

Media-and-Communication.png

1362 ms

Retail-Commerce1.png

Retail-Commerce1.png

1365 ms

Travel-and-Hospitality.png

Travel-and-Hospitality.png

1172 ms

Mobile-Content-Management.png

Mobile-Content-Management.png

1135 ms

Software-Development-Guide.png

Software-Development-Guide.png

1127 ms

Payment-gateway.png

Payment-gateway.png

960 ms

Smart-farming-benefits-1.png

Smart-farming-benefits-1.png

923 ms

footer.webp

footer.webp

1059 ms

dmca-badge.png

dmca-badge.png

646 ms

Accessibility Review

successive.in accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

successive.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

successive.in SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Successive.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Successive.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

successive.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Successive. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: