Tools & Wizards About Us
successive.tech screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

successive.tech

Digital Transformation Services & Solutions - Successive Digital

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

34 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

successive.tech screenshot

About Website

Visit successive.tech now to see the best up-to-date Successive content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about successive.tech

Successive Digital is a digital transformation company offering digital strategy, product engineering, CX, and Cloud and Data services. Contact Today!

Visit successive.tech

Key Findings

We analyzed Successive.tech page load time and found that the first response time was 34 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

successive.tech performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,690 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.198

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.0 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

successive.tech

34 ms

successive.tech

2174 ms

3074bd279e7d86d5c80a4c7ce05933a8.css

40 ms

jquery.js

39 ms

v2.js

68 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Successive.tech, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Js.hsforms.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Successive.tech.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 860.8 kB (19%)

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Successive.tech main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 119.9 kB

  • Original 151.6 kB
  • After minification 132.9 kB
  • After compression 31.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 739.2 kB

  • Original 4.2 MB
  • After minification 3.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Successive needs image optimization as it can save up to 739.2 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 138.2 kB
  • After minification 138.2 kB
  • After compression 136.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 98.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (15%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

62

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Successive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

successive.tech

successive.tech

34 ms

successive.tech

successive.tech

2174 ms

3074bd279e7d86d5c80a4c7ce05933a8.css

3074bd279e7d86d5c80a4c7ce05933a8.css

40 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

39 ms

v2.js

v2.js

68 ms

lottie.min.js

lottie.min.js

29 ms

jquery.custom-scrollbar.min.js

jquery.custom-scrollbar.min.js

61 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

56 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

58 ms

ScrollTrigger.min.js

ScrollTrigger.min.js

57 ms

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

59 ms

successive.js

successive.js

58 ms

hslider.js

hslider.js

58 ms

main.js

main.js

59 ms

css2

css2

50 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

196 ms

SuccessiveDigitalLogo-DarkBG.png

SuccessiveDigitalLogo-DarkBG.png

140 ms

SuccessiveDigitalLogo-LightBG.png

SuccessiveDigitalLogo-LightBG.png

20 ms

arrow-red.svg

arrow-red.svg

33 ms

about-us.png

about-us.png

36 ms

Services.png

Services.png

26 ms

Cloud-Accelerators.png

Cloud-Accelerators.png

35 ms

industries.png

industries.png

35 ms

devops-2-1-768x480.jpg

devops-2-1-768x480.jpg

37 ms

Group-770770.png

Group-770770.png

62 ms

about-us.webp

about-us.webp

393 ms

services.webp

services.webp

494 ms

Vector-1.png

Vector-1.png

62 ms

cloud-accelerators.webp

cloud-accelerators.webp

437 ms

Artboard-1-3-150x94.png

Artboard-1-3-150x94.png

48 ms

Development-Cost-150x94.png

Development-Cost-150x94.png

62 ms

Artboard-1-2-1-150x94.png

Artboard-1-2-1-150x94.png

76 ms

about.webp

about.webp

727 ms

UX-min.webp

UX-min.webp

613 ms

Advanced-data-min.webp

Advanced-data-min.webp

632 ms

customer-experince-min.webp

customer-experince-min.webp

945 ms

telemedicine-min.webp

telemedicine-min.webp

1055 ms

service-slide-1.webp

service-slide-1.webp

1083 ms

Cloud.webp

Cloud.webp

1217 ms

Commerce.webp

Commerce.webp

1166 ms

CMS.webp

CMS.webp

1344 ms

Creative.webp

Creative.webp

1566 ms

aws.webp

aws.webp

1668 ms

Google_Cloud_Partner_no_outline_vertical.png

Google_Cloud_Partner_no_outline_vertical.png

1103 ms

awsparterner.webp

awsparterner.webp

1722 ms

Strapi.webp

Strapi.webp

2223 ms

Adobe-logo-1.png

Adobe-logo-1.png

1234 ms

Contentful.png

Contentful.png

1257 ms

Storyblok.png

Storyblok.png

1270 ms

acquia.png

acquia.png

1282 ms

BigCommerce.webp

BigCommerce.webp

2327 ms

svgviewer-png-output.png

svgviewer-png-output.png

1356 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff

17 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff

30 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff

45 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff

33 ms

gordita-bold-webfont.woff

gordita-bold-webfont.woff

1690 ms

gordita-medium-webfont.woff

gordita-medium-webfont.woff

1828 ms

gordita-regular-webfont.woff

gordita-regular-webfont.woff

1941 ms

Micro_Focus_logo.svg.png

Micro_Focus_logo.svg.png

1678 ms

download.png

download.png

1691 ms

image-2.png

image-2.png

1705 ms

image-1.png

image-1.png

1702 ms

unnamed.png

unnamed.png

1706 ms

digital-healthcare-min.png

digital-healthcare-min.png

1698 ms

Maritime-Transformation-min.png

Maritime-Transformation-min.png

1704 ms

Transforming-Agriculture.webp

Transforming-Agriculture.webp

2382 ms

lakeshore.png

lakeshore.png

2349 ms

Payment-Solution.webp

Payment-Solution.webp

2319 ms

payment-min-1.png

payment-min-1.png

1601 ms

Untitled-2.png

Untitled-2.png

1578 ms

industriesagri-min.png

industriesagri-min.png

1539 ms

Logistics-Distribution.png

Logistics-Distribution.png

1452 ms

Media-and-Communication.png

Media-and-Communication.png

1453 ms

Retail-Commerce1.png

Retail-Commerce1.png

1385 ms

Travel-and-Hospitality.png

Travel-and-Hospitality.png

1184 ms

Artboard-1-3.png

Artboard-1-3.png

1098 ms

Development-Cost.png

Development-Cost.png

1087 ms

Artboard-1-2-1.png

Artboard-1-2-1.png

1082 ms

Artboard-1-2.png

Artboard-1-2.png

1050 ms

footer.webp

footer.webp

1589 ms

dmca-badge.png

dmca-badge.png

1007 ms

Accessibility Review

successive.tech accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

successive.tech best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

successive.tech SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Successive.tech can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Successive.tech main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

successive.tech

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Successive. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: