3.5 sec in total
549 ms
2.4 sec
523 ms
Visit sudprof.ru now to see the best up-to-date Sudprof content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sudprof.ru
Адвокат Лыткин Сергей Геннадьевич. Гражданские и арбитражные судебные споры любой сложности. Успешный опыт более 18 лет. Офис в двух шагах от метро Бабушкинская.
Visit sudprof.ruWe analyzed Sudprof.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 549 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
sudprof.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value210 ms
89/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
549 ms
328 ms
222 ms
225 ms
222 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Sudprof.ru, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (827 ms) belongs to the original domain Sudprof.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 134.0 kB (7%)
2.0 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Sudprof.ru main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.7 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sudprof images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 23.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.9 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sudprof.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.2 kB or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (58%)
57
24
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sudprof. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sudprof.ru
549 ms
fajar.css
328 ms
jquery.fullPage.css
222 ms
easy-responsive-tabs.css
225 ms
owl.carousel.css
222 ms
navigation.css
225 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
236 ms
cubeportfolio.min.css
337 ms
main.css
339 ms
loader.css
340 ms
bootstrap.css
349 ms
default-color.css
355 ms
switcher.css
448 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
558 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
454 ms
jquery.min.js
468 ms
bootstrap.min.js
476 ms
js
48 ms
map-blue.js
554 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
562 ms
jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js
675 ms
main.js
586 ms
jquery.fullPage.js
598 ms
jquery.superslides.js
669 ms
easyResponsiveTabs.js
673 ms
scrollspy.js
677 ms
counter.js
709 ms
waypoints.js
718 ms
jquery.stellar.js
781 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
788 ms
scripts.js
789 ms
jquery.maximage.js
793 ms
jquery.appear.js
827 ms
animations.js
736 ms
switcher.js
793 ms
fonts.css
581 ms
font-awesome.css
581 ms
fajar-icons.css
588 ms
css
27 ms
watch.js
119 ms
index4-banner.jpg
453 ms
logo-white.png
205 ms
have-interest-parallax-bg.jpg
436 ms
testi_01.jpg
346 ms
testi_02.jpg
327 ms
testi_03.jpg
328 ms
testi_04.jpg
442 ms
testi_05.jpg
446 ms
testi_06.jpg
447 ms
testi_07.jpg
469 ms
blog-img1.jpg
551 ms
blog-img2.jpg
559 ms
blog-img3.jpg
562 ms
submit-img.png
562 ms
black-transparent.png
571 ms
office-img1.jpg
591 ms
office-img2.jpg
665 ms
office-img3.jpg
675 ms
office-img4.jpg
677 ms
office-arrows.png
678 ms
team-left-arrow.png
486 ms
team-right-arrow.png
508 ms
SourceSansPro-Light-webfont.woff
572 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
588 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYA.ttf
8 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf
16 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUZiYA.ttf
17 ms
fajar.woff
799 ms
sudprof.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
sudprof.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
sudprof.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sudprof.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sudprof.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sudprof.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sudprof. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: