Tools & Wizards About Us
suffolklive.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

suffolklive.com

Suffolk - Essex Live

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

162 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

68 ms

suffolklive.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to suffolklive.com homepage info - get ready to check Suffolk Live best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about suffolklive.com

Visit suffolklive.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Suffolklive.com page load time and found that the first response time was 162 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

suffolklive.com performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value12,670 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.16

73/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value45.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

suffolklive.com

162 ms

www.suffolklive.com

27 ms

suffolk

380 ms

section-base.css

73 ms

chameleon-static-html.css

62 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Suffolklive.com, 49% (22 requests) were made to S2-prod.essexlive.news and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source S2-prod.essexlive.news.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 288.8 kB (17%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Suffolklive.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 258.5 kB

  • Original 309.9 kB
  • After minification 309.2 kB
  • After compression 51.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 258.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 12.4 kB
  • After minification 9.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Suffolk Live needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.6 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 26.7 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 1.3 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 46.4 kB
  • After minification 46.4 kB
  • After compression 45.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Suffolklive.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (85%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Suffolk Live. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

suffolklive.com

suffolklive.com

162 ms

www.suffolklive.com

www.suffolklive.com

27 ms

suffolk

suffolk

380 ms

section-base.css

section-base.css

73 ms

chameleon-static-html.css

chameleon-static-html.css

62 ms

marwood-extended.css

marwood-extended.css

1003 ms

brand-extended-clipper.df14f5e7ca52c27e.css

brand-extended-clipper.df14f5e7ca52c27e.css

81 ms

css2

css2

70 ms

c93383dcb6d1a38f30dcdd685d8734c420fe12fd08b84e1b2cb549076ee63672

c93383dcb6d1a38f30dcdd685d8734c420fe12fd08b84e1b2cb549076ee63672

80 ms

s.min.js

s.min.js

1478 ms

runForceReconsent.min.js

runForceReconsent.min.js

58 ms

pwt.js

pwt.js

87 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

129 ms

iasPET.1.js

iasPET.1.js

72 ms

prebid-test.js

prebid-test.js

1478 ms

tags.min.js

tags.min.js

75 ms

section.min.js

section.min.js

32 ms

partner.min.js

partner.min.js

38 ms

chameleon-static-html.min.js

chameleon-static-html.min.js

35 ms

section.min.js

section.min.js

1428 ms

withnail.min.js

withnail.min.js

46 ms

ats.js

ats.js

34 ms

smile-web.min.js

smile-web.min.js

36 ms

style.css

style.css

42 ms

index.js

index.js

47 ms

auth-ui.min.js

auth-ui.min.js

52 ms

analytics.js.gz

analytics.js.gz

35 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

512 ms

choice.js

choice.js

576 ms

apstag.js

apstag.js

94 ms

analytics.config.json

analytics.config.json

333 ms

logo-essexlive.652bcae9f9025542.png

logo-essexlive.652bcae9f9025542.png

28 ms

section.css

section.css

9 ms

withnail.css

withnail.css

12 ms

section.css

section.css

334 ms

font

font

82 ms

icomoon.00495dd3fc67aad5.woff

icomoon.00495dd3fc67aad5.woff

324 ms

ipso.a49db49dfe703ca7.svg

ipso.a49db49dfe703ca7.svg

341 ms

js

js

40 ms

door.js

door.js

200 ms

verify-2.0.1.min.js

verify-2.0.1.min.js

151 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

120 ms

css2

css2

18 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

65 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

6 ms

Accessibility Review

suffolklive.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

suffolklive.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

suffolklive.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Suffolklive.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Suffolklive.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

suffolklive.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Suffolk Live. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: