Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

sugarcreambeauty.com

Thyroid Disorders: Symptoms, Causes, and Treatment Options

Page Load Speed

950 ms in total

First Response

54 ms

Resources Loaded

776 ms

Page Rendered

120 ms

sugarcreambeauty.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to sugarcreambeauty.com homepage info - get ready to check Sugarcreambeauty best content right away, or after learning these important things about sugarcreambeauty.com

Free weblog publishing tool from Google, for sharing text, photos and video.

Visit sugarcreambeauty.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sugarcreambeauty.com page load time and found that the first response time was 54 ms and then it took 896 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sugarcreambeauty.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.072

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sugarcreambeauty.com

54 ms

www.sugarcreambeauty.com

131 ms

blogin.g

80 ms

ServiceLogin

40 ms

blogin.g

127 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Sugarcreambeauty.com, 29% (4 requests) were made to Ssl.gstatic.com and 14% (2 requests) were made to Blogger.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (251 ms) relates to the external source Accounts.google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 100.4 kB (64%)

Content Size

156.0 kB

After Optimization

55.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Sugarcreambeauty.com main page is 156.0 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 148.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 100.4 kB

  • Original 148.3 kB
  • After minification 147.5 kB
  • After compression 47.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.4 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 26 B

  • Original 7.7 kB
  • After minification 7.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sugarcreambeauty images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sugarcreambeauty. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

sugarcreambeauty.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

sugarcreambeauty.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sugarcreambeauty.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sugarcreambeauty.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sugarcreambeauty.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sugarcreambeauty. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: