2.2 sec in total
421 ms
1.6 sec
127 ms
Visit sugardaddy.travel now to see the best up-to-date Sugar Daddy content for China and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sugardaddy.travel
Experience Sugar Dating Relationships
Visit sugardaddy.travelWe analyzed Sugardaddy.travel page load time and found that the first response time was 421 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
sugardaddy.travel performance score
421 ms
24 ms
192 ms
202 ms
131 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Sugardaddy.travel, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (641 ms) belongs to the original domain Sugardaddy.travel.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (61%)
1.9 MB
737.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Sugardaddy.travel main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 745.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sugar Daddy images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 462.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 462.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 648.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sugardaddy.travel needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 648.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (77%)
53
12
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sugar Daddy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sugardaddy.travel
421 ms
css
24 ms
bootstrap.min.css
192 ms
font-awesome.min.css
202 ms
simple-line-icons.min.css
131 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
132 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
131 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
133 ms
theme.css
268 ms
theme-elements.css
335 ms
theme-blog.css
202 ms
theme-shop.css
203 ms
theme-animate.css
254 ms
settings.css
256 ms
layers.css
258 ms
navigation.css
262 ms
component.css
316 ms
skin-corporate-digital-agency.css
322 ms
custom.css
321 ms
modernizr.min.js
330 ms
blog.css
330 ms
jquery.min.js
403 ms
jquery.appear.min.js
365 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
365 ms
jquery-cookie.min.js
368 ms
bootstrap.min.js
367 ms
common.min.js
367 ms
jquery.validation.min.js
425 ms
jquery.stellar.min.js
401 ms
jquery.easy-pie-chart.min.js
424 ms
jquery.gmap.min.js
434 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
433 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
467 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
474 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
482 ms
vide.min.js
466 ms
theme.js
485 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
594 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
593 ms
jquery.flipshow.min.js
460 ms
view.home.js
460 ms
theme.init.js
398 ms
mt_logo3.png
281 ms
map_bg.png
641 ms
hp_girls.png
610 ms
hp_seen-on.jpg
421 ms
like.php
134 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
68 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
80 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
96 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
79 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
80 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
419 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
69 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
73 ms
analytics.js
43 ms
revicons.woff
70 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
5 ms
sugardaddy.travel SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sugardaddy.travel can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Sugardaddy.travel main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sugardaddy.travel
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sugar Daddy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: