Tools & Wizards About Us
sugaring.london screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

sugaring.london

Sugaring Hair Removal London - Your Favourite Sugaring Destination

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

169 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

595 ms

sugaring.london screenshot

About Website

Visit sugaring.london now to see the best up-to-date Sugaring content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sugaring.london

Sugaring Hair Removal is the next hair removal trend in London you are going to be obsessed with.Our best therapists are highly trained in the art of sugaring!

Visit sugaring.london

Key Findings

We analyzed Sugaring.london page load time and found that the first response time was 169 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sugaring.london performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value670 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.01

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.8 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sugaring.london

169 ms

sugaring.london

879 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

132 ms

style.min.css

210 ms

style.min.css

302 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Sugaring.london, 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Sugaring.london.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 116.4 kB (4%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sugaring.london main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 45.7 kB

  • Original 56.7 kB
  • After minification 46.0 kB
  • After compression 11.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.7 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 60 B

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sugaring images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 36.9 kB

  • Original 186.1 kB
  • After minification 186.1 kB
  • After compression 149.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 36.9 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 33.7 kB

  • Original 145.1 kB
  • After minification 145.1 kB
  • After compression 111.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sugaring.london needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.7 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (60%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sugaring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sugaring.london

sugaring.london

169 ms

sugaring.london

sugaring.london

879 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

132 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

210 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

302 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

307 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

228 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

229 ms

vendors-style.css

vendors-style.css

287 ms

style.css

style.css

392 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

311 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

313 ms

style.css

style.css

364 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

381 ms

theme.css

theme.css

378 ms

styles.css

styles.css

458 ms

style.css

style.css

399 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

515 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

456 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

457 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

473 ms

jquery.cookie.min.js

jquery.cookie.min.js

473 ms

wooptpm.js

wooptpm.js

542 ms

js

js

59 ms

player_api

player_api

45 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

490 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

491 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

509 ms

cart-fragments.min.js

cart-fragments.min.js

557 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

564 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

612 ms

retina.min.js

retina.min.js

611 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

612 ms

google-ads.js

google-ads.js

619 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

634 ms

widget-book-now-2dc89e.js

widget-book-now-2dc89e.js

4 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

76 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

125 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

72 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

187 ms

instagram-icon.svg

instagram-icon.svg

191 ms

facebook-icon.svg

facebook-icon.svg

188 ms

pinterest_logo.svg

pinterest_logo.svg

191 ms

Tiktok_logo.svg

Tiktok_logo.svg

204 ms

logo_small.svg

logo_small.svg

205 ms

phone_icon.svg

phone_icon.svg

226 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

437 ms

top_bg.png

top_bg.png

291 ms

carousel_shape_top.png

carousel_shape_top.png

292 ms

carousel_shape_bottom.png

carousel_shape_bottom.png

292 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

601 ms

slide2.jpg

slide2.jpg

458 ms

slides_5.jpg

slides_5.jpg

589 ms

slide3.jpg

slide3.jpg

518 ms

slide4.jpg

slide4.jpg

593 ms

hero_video_thumbnail.webp

hero_video_thumbnail.webp

513 ms

play.png

play.png

549 ms

homepage_packages.webp

homepage_packages.webp

599 ms

ingredients.png

ingredients.png

598 ms

about-us.png

about-us.png

701 ms

reviews_bottom_bg.jpg

reviews_bottom_bg.jpg

666 ms

testimonials_shape_top.png

testimonials_shape_top.png

672 ms

review2.png

review2.png

674 ms

review.png

review.png

676 ms

review3.png

review3.png

903 ms

arrow-left.png

arrow-left.png

744 ms

arrow-right.png

arrow-right.png

752 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

59 ms

testimonials_shape_bottom.png

testimonials_shape_bottom.png

706 ms

contacts_bg.jpg

contacts_bg.jpg

698 ms

phone-icon.png

phone-icon.png

721 ms

FuturaPTCond-Bold.woff

FuturaPTCond-Bold.woff

719 ms

FuturaPTCond-ExtraBold.woff

FuturaPTCond-ExtraBold.woff

726 ms

FuturaPT-Book.woff

FuturaPT-Book.woff

725 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

17 ms

ec.js

ec.js

60 ms

FuturaPTCond-Book.woff

FuturaPTCond-Book.woff

710 ms

email-icon.png

email-icon.png

727 ms

sugaring.london

sugaring.london

1018 ms

cactus.png

cactus.png

791 ms

christiana.jpg

christiana.jpg

797 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

js

js

55 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

80 ms

Accessibility Review

sugaring.london accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sugaring.london best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sugaring.london SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sugaring.london can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sugaring.london main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sugaring.london

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sugaring. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: