2.5 sec in total
98 ms
2.3 sec
155 ms
Visit sugarlite.com now to see the best up-to-date Sugarlite content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sugarlite.com
Sugarlite is a Low-Calorie sugar perfect for weight loss. It is a blend of Sugar and 100% Natural Stevia which makes it a healthy replacement to your ordinary sugar. Adding Sugarlite across to your fa...
Visit sugarlite.comWe analyzed Sugarlite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 98 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
sugarlite.com performance score
98 ms
128 ms
1236 ms
110 ms
83 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Sugarlite.com, 12% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Sugarlite.com.
Page size can be reduced by 114.2 kB (21%)
550.2 kB
436.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Sugarlite.com main page is 550.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 312.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 99.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 99.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 188 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sugarlite images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sugarlite.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (88%)
66
8
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sugarlite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sugarlite.com
98 ms
sugarlite.com
128 ms
www.sugarlite.com
1236 ms
style.min.css
110 ms
main.css
83 ms
progressbar.min.css
84 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
83 ms
slick.css
80 ms
font-awesome.min.css
89 ms
remodal.css
109 ms
remodal-default-theme.css
110 ms
styles.css
110 ms
style.css
111 ms
style.css
116 ms
bootstrap.min.css
145 ms
caseicon.css
137 ms
flaticon.css
138 ms
magnific-popup.css
139 ms
animate.css
141 ms
theme.css
254 ms
css
37 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
167 ms
custom-frontend-lite.min.css
190 ms
post-12.css
165 ms
global.css
169 ms
post-8999.css
176 ms
post-7642.css
196 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
471 ms
css
79 ms
fontawesome.min.css
221 ms
brands.min.css
210 ms
jquery.min.js
245 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
227 ms
main.js
240 ms
ct-inline-css.js
429 ms
js
67 ms
rs6.css
430 ms
notify.min.js
429 ms
remodal.min.js
428 ms
ct-user-form.js
429 ms
index.js
429 ms
index.js
429 ms
rbtools.min.js
359 ms
rs6.min.js
733 ms
bootstrap.min.js
356 ms
nice-select.min.js
356 ms
css
12 ms
match-height-min.js
352 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
351 ms
progressbar.min.js
331 ms
wow.min.js
332 ms
main.js
331 ms
woocommerce.js
332 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
326 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
303 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
303 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
302 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
300 ms
waypoints.min.js
290 ms
core.min.js
276 ms
frontend.min.js
275 ms
amazon.jpg
40 ms
Blinkit-logo-1.png
40 ms
flipkart.jpg
38 ms
bigbasket.jpg
38 ms
js
115 ms
analytics.js
139 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
138 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
161 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
168 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
166 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
169 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
175 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
168 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
168 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
178 ms
collect
20 ms
collect
32 ms
sugarlite.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sugarlite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sugarlite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sugarlite.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sugarlite. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: