Tools & Wizards About Us
sugarpinecatering.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

sugarpinecatering.com

Full Service Caterer and Event Space | Colorado Caterer

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

158 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

sugarpinecatering.com screenshot

About Website

Visit sugarpinecatering.com now to see the best up-to-date Sugarpinecatering content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sugarpinecatering.com

Colorado front range wedding caterer specializing in sustainability practices. We provide a bespoke, epicurean experience.

Visit sugarpinecatering.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sugarpinecatering.com page load time and found that the first response time was 158 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sugarpinecatering.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value79.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value28.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value61.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sugarpinecatering.com

158 ms

sugarpinecatering.com

36 ms

premium-addons.min.css

15 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

28 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Sugarpinecatering.com, 24% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (694 ms) belongs to the original domain Sugarpinecatering.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 28.0 MB (99%)

Content Size

28.4 MB

After Optimization

420.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sugarpinecatering.com main page is 28.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 27.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 83.0 kB

  • Original 103.0 kB
  • After minification 95.7 kB
  • After compression 20.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-100%

Potential reduce by 27.8 MB

  • Original 27.9 MB
  • After minification 67.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sugarpinecatering needs image optimization as it can save up to 27.8 MB or 100% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 50.1 kB

  • Original 223.1 kB
  • After minification 223.1 kB
  • After compression 173.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 50.1 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 28.1 kB

  • Original 187.5 kB
  • After minification 187.5 kB
  • After compression 159.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sugarpinecatering.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.1 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (75%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sugarpinecatering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

sugarpinecatering.com

sugarpinecatering.com

158 ms

sugarpinecatering.com

sugarpinecatering.com

36 ms

premium-addons.min.css

premium-addons.min.css

15 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

28 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

33 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

30 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

31 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

31 ms

post-10.css

post-10.css

30 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

37 ms

eael-223.css

eael-223.css

46 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

44 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

43 ms

global.css

global.css

39 ms

post-223.css

post-223.css

38 ms

post-49.css

post-49.css

46 ms

post-182.css

post-182.css

48 ms

all.css

all.css

64 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

76 ms

css

css

68 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

49 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

48 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

45 ms

widget-carousel.min.css

widget-carousel.min.css

49 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

48 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

48 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

49 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

53 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

50 ms

eael-223.js

eael-223.js

52 ms

e-202437.js

e-202437.js

45 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

50 ms

premium-wrapper-link.min.js

premium-wrapper-link.min.js

51 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

52 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

52 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

52 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

53 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

53 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

53 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

54 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

54 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

54 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

39 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

34 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

35 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

33 ms

SPC-Lead-1.png

SPC-Lead-1.png

67 ms

SP-Home-Lead-7.png

SP-Home-Lead-7.png

65 ms

SP-Home-Lead-22.png

SP-Home-Lead-22.png

46 ms

SP-Home-Lead-24.png

SP-Home-Lead-24.png

82 ms

SP-Home-Lead-9.png

SP-Home-Lead-9.png

79 ms

SP-Home-Lead-5.png

SP-Home-Lead-5.png

73 ms

SPC-Brand-2-qetp40fooq4ztlvq13v7x452giju3o5551uttbxols.png

SPC-Brand-2-qetp40fooq4ztlvq13v7x452giju3o5551uttbxols.png

12 ms

SPC-Heart-and-Soul-5.png

SPC-Heart-and-Soul-5.png

694 ms

SP-Press-1.jpg

SP-Press-1.jpg

51 ms

SP-Press-2.jpg

SP-Press-2.jpg

56 ms

SP-Press-5.jpg

SP-Press-5.jpg

61 ms

SP-Press-3.jpg

SP-Press-3.jpg

66 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWyWtFCc.ttf

21 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

41 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-vNiXg7Q.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-vNiXg7Q.ttf

51 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

54 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA3q5d0.ttf

53 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfed3FHGPc.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfed3FHGPc.ttf

52 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

52 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

53 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

53 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtFOvWDSA.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtFOvWDSA.ttf

54 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

98 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

53 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

55 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEN2JQEk.ttf

54 ms

VuJ2dNDF2Yv9qppOePKYRP12ZjtdlUndpA.ttf

VuJ2dNDF2Yv9qppOePKYRP12ZjtdlUndpA.ttf

122 ms

VuJpdNDF2Yv9qppOePKYRP1-3R5NuGvVjjLkeQ.ttf

VuJpdNDF2Yv9qppOePKYRP1-3R5NuGvVjjLkeQ.ttf

172 ms

DdT678IGsGw1aF1JU10PUbTvNNaDMfq95-BDHzG2u9s.ttf

DdT678IGsGw1aF1JU10PUbTvNNaDMfq95-BDHzG2u9s.ttf

314 ms

DdT878IGsGw1aF1JU10PUbTvNNaDMfq41-dJHRO0.ttf

DdT878IGsGw1aF1JU10PUbTvNNaDMfq41-dJHRO0.ttf

84 ms

DdT578IGsGw1aF1JU10PUbTvNNaDMfID8vdkPxuesdPs.ttf

DdT578IGsGw1aF1JU10PUbTvNNaDMfID8vdkPxuesdPs.ttf

83 ms

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

0 ms

Accessibility Review

sugarpinecatering.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

sugarpinecatering.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sugarpinecatering.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sugarpinecatering.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sugarpinecatering.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sugarpinecatering.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sugarpinecatering. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: