Tools & Wizards About Us
sugarprocesstech.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

sugarprocesstech.com

Sugar Industry Technologies | SugarProcessTech | Sugar Technology

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

511 ms

sugarprocesstech.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Sugar Process Tech content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sugarprocesstech.com

Knowledge in sugar industry technologies | capacity & EDD calculation with online calculators. we invite articles from all sugar technologists.

Visit sugarprocesstech.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sugarprocesstech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sugarprocesstech.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.7 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,320 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.112

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.8 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.sugarprocesstech.com

1167 ms

adsbygoogle.js

93 ms

js

75 ms

js

141 ms

wgs2.css

247 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Sugarprocesstech.com, 13% (6 requests) were made to Google.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Sugarprocesstech.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 126.7 kB (16%)

Content Size

806.0 kB

After Optimization

679.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Sugarprocesstech.com main page is 806.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 344.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 97.3 kB

  • Original 112.9 kB
  • After minification 106.5 kB
  • After compression 15.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 19.1 kB

  • Original 263.1 kB
  • After minification 244.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sugar Process Tech images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 344.7 kB
  • After minification 344.7 kB
  • After compression 342.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 8.2 kB

  • Original 85.3 kB
  • After minification 85.3 kB
  • After compression 77.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sugarprocesstech.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (67%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sugar Process Tech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.sugarprocesstech.com

www.sugarprocesstech.com

1167 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

93 ms

js

js

75 ms

js

js

141 ms

wgs2.css

wgs2.css

247 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

487 ms

styles.css

styles.css

685 ms

1-popupally-style.css

1-popupally-style.css

688 ms

style-frontend-pro.css

style-frontend-pro.css

694 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

916 ms

style.css

style.css

928 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

720 ms

css

css

49 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1143 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

924 ms

popup.min.js

popup.min.js

927 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

87 ms

google_cse_v2.js

google_cse_v2.js

955 ms

islemag-wigdet.js

islemag-wigdet.js

1177 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1177 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1177 ms

index.js

index.js

1178 ms

index.js

index.js

1206 ms

script.index.js

script.index.js

1369 ms

script.all.js

script.all.js

1373 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1378 ms

White-sugar-making.jpg

White-sugar-making.jpg

502 ms

convetion-tables.jpg

convetion-tables.jpg

325 ms

sugarprocesstech.png

sugarprocesstech.png

743 ms

font

font

64 ms

islemag-background.jpg

islemag-background.jpg

449 ms

font

font

36 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

850 ms

font

font

41 ms

cse.js

cse.js

35 ms

cse.js

cse.js

137 ms

Hydrostatic-pressure-head-e1555691437133.jpg

Hydrostatic-pressure-head-e1555691437133.jpg

231 ms

STAI.jpg

STAI.jpg

236 ms

sugar-plant-capacity-calcul.jpg

sugar-plant-capacity-calcul.jpg

378 ms

Powder_activated_carbon_process_sugar_refinery-420x420.webp

Powder_activated_carbon_process_sugar_refinery-420x420.webp

382 ms

Sugar_Refinery_equipment_capacities_calculation-420x420.webp

Sugar_Refinery_equipment_capacities_calculation-420x420.webp

461 ms

jar-tests-purpose-procedure-and-significance-420x420.webp

jar-tests-purpose-procedure-and-significance-420x420.webp

472 ms

cse_element__en.js

cse_element__en.js

9 ms

default+en.css

default+en.css

107 ms

espresso.css

espresso.css

106 ms

async-ads.js

async-ads.js

95 ms

branding.png

branding.png

55 ms

clear.png

clear.png

32 ms

Accessibility Review

sugarprocesstech.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Best Practices

sugarprocesstech.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sugarprocesstech.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sugarprocesstech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sugarprocesstech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

sugarprocesstech.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sugar Process Tech. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: