2.8 sec in total
138 ms
2.6 sec
57 ms
Click here to check amazing Sugar Styling content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sugarstyling.com
Gold Coast professional Property Styling and Home Staging company, specialising in styling homes to make your property desirable, to attract more potential buyers and maximise your sale price. Contact...
Visit sugarstyling.comWe analyzed Sugarstyling.com page load time and found that the first response time was 138 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
sugarstyling.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value10.4 s
0/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value1,280 ms
18/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value18.5 s
3/100
10%
138 ms
23 ms
51 ms
55 ms
86 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sugarstyling.com, 53% (34 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 25% (16 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 459.7 kB (25%)
1.8 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Sugarstyling.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 411.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 411.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sugar Styling images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (20%)
51
41
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sugar Styling. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.sugarstyling.com
138 ms
minified.js
23 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
51 ms
polyfill.min.js
55 ms
thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js
86 ms
main.317ed945.bundle.min.js
88 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
87 ms
lodash.min.js
133 ms
react.production.min.js
98 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
123 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
142 ms
SS_Logo_Landscape_Black-01.jpg
308 ms
cadc50_508b118decef4a2382565c7b8c99bc12~mv2.jpg
458 ms
cadc50_5cada0c1dc07455eb984bcfcd7650e28~mv2.jpg
444 ms
cadc50_09455f55a0084c9a8957b64b0eefbfd5~mv2.jpg
493 ms
b96790_5619ce7377b44c33a71fc350a8d1f12d~mv2.jpg
514 ms
b96790_e0f64a625cfd4cafabba0239d137e32a~mv2.jpg
455 ms
b96790_315eb923dd934250baabc1c0aa93ec56~mv2.jpg
530 ms
b96790_3e1e0c453efc4f80a1a07e5b92525ac9~mv2.jpg
685 ms
b96790_531c9b836ad04182bf8467c95c0c5428~mv2.jpg
731 ms
b96790_fc1075c67f5549d7a322642a16a6b1eb~mv2.jpg
692 ms
b96790_1f334bb8ce974b138d2cf7e3c85f23dc~mv2.jpg
844 ms
b96790_9bc83323497b4351a13ebb2ca4dad5e8~mv2.jpg
822 ms
b96790_fb9f2f37bc3c4f528719c77d912d22f3~mv2.jpg
786 ms
b96790_5c7d58a3997b4086b2acb67602c04ad9~mv2.jpg
949 ms
b96790_de796dabfc65413da5e72a6fbf3d4c90~mv2.jpg
995 ms
b96790_95d3d983327347b4a4b3ad33e7930967~mv2.jpg
993 ms
b96790_0a1d42fb3a234c40872fb556d0ad33a9~mv2.jpg
1030 ms
b96790_7854386673714dff88c10fcf08539190~mv2.jpg
1064 ms
b96790_1de399533ba7471cbb21354714c7bb5e~mv2.jpg
1138 ms
b96790_76d1110ee5fc4047b455986ae229205f~mv2.jpg
1183 ms
b96790_dd742c6ea5004e1dbca217cf587f3679~mv2.jpg
1265 ms
b96790_407584fcb603445baef0c705319eb23e~mv2.jpg
1234 ms
b96790_a3bf85b02f1d42d3a51f84acc97b2e2d~mv2.jpg
1238 ms
b96790_86edd3428af9424f80e66beed171190f~mv2.jpg
1298 ms
b96790_945c4030a1ed409e80b8978e7396638e~mv2.jpg
1430 ms
b96790_4bc16f9e3a054ec98f74286642f16a92~mv2.jpg
1475 ms
b96790_708fa237ebc14531b91f30d027c560a4~mv2.jpg
1503 ms
b96790_3082716f4bb74266961ea71b9d1d0ff2~mv2.jpg
1494 ms
b96790_c805ddd06aca4b63b4571cf1bf45b0f1~mv2.jpg
1622 ms
b96790_c303b5f26112422e822172e3246b53ce~mv2_d_3600_2396_s_2.jpg
1611 ms
b96790_0fca3d480633431c8f5ae91133977942~mv2_d_3600_2396_s_2.jpg
1676 ms
Freshwater%2027.jpg
1600 ms
Freshwater%2028.jpg
1817 ms
Freshwater%2031.jpg
1719 ms
tiny_arrows.4355fe50.png
53 ms
bundle.tracing.es5.min.js
74 ms
61 ms
59 ms
56 ms
55 ms
51 ms
46 ms
45 ms
43 ms
42 ms
4 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
19 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
6 ms
right-arrow.svg
13 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
4 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
4 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
7 ms
sugarstyling.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
sugarstyling.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
sugarstyling.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sugarstyling.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sugarstyling.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sugarstyling.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sugar Styling. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: