16.1 sec in total
6.5 sec
8.8 sec
828 ms
Welcome to sugarwedding.com.ng homepage info - get ready to check Sugarwedding best content for Nigeria right away, or after learning these important things about sugarwedding.com.ng
sugar wedding
Visit sugarwedding.com.ngWe analyzed Sugarwedding.com.ng page load time and found that the first response time was 6.5 sec and then it took 9.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
sugarwedding.com.ng performance score
6526 ms
125 ms
33 ms
117 ms
116 ms
Our browser made a total of 135 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Sugarwedding.com.ng, 16% (21 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com and 7% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Sugarwedding.com.ng.
Page size can be reduced by 919.4 kB (24%)
3.8 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Sugarwedding.com.ng main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 119.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.2 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sugarwedding images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 393.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 393.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 363.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sugarwedding.com.ng needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 363.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (42%)
125
72
The browser has sent 125 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sugarwedding. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
sugarwedding.com.ng
6526 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
125 ms
font-awesome.min.css
33 ms
frontend.css
117 ms
adsns.css
116 ms
styles.css
413 ms
tp_twitter_plugin.css
168 ms
font-awesome.min.css
498 ms
bootstrap.css
285 ms
font-awesome.css
305 ms
style.css
270 ms
responsive.css
308 ms
css
42 ms
jquery.js
525 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
641 ms
site.js
33 ms
frontend.css
369 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
416 ms
prettyPhoto.css
464 ms
post-like.js
533 ms
jquery.form.min.js
525 ms
scripts.js
579 ms
admin.js
585 ms
ZeroClipboard.js
717 ms
bootstrap.min.js
642 ms
plugins.js
793 ms
custom.js
755 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
861 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
812 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
845 ms
analytics.js
19 ms
back_pattern.png
379 ms
sugl.jpg
387 ms
124.jpg
436 ms
123.jpg
500 ms
122.jpg
436 ms
120-950x500.jpg
520 ms
119-1140x500.jpg
602 ms
219.jpg
705 ms
124-640x350.jpg
528 ms
123-650x350.jpg
708 ms
122-650x350.jpg
616 ms
120-748x350.jpg
640 ms
119-748x350.jpg
622 ms
219-600x350.jpg
706 ms
218-748x350.jpg
811 ms
1-600x350.jpeg
720 ms
118-748x350.jpg
761 ms
31-748x350.jpg
811 ms
Etisalat_ads.gif
837 ms
124-60x60.jpg
835 ms
123-60x60.jpg
809 ms
122-60x60.jpg
851 ms
120-60x60.jpg
861 ms
119-60x60.jpg
948 ms
129-60x60.jpg
990 ms
1-60x60.jpeg
996 ms
119-60x60.jpg
988 ms
118-60x60.jpg
985 ms
widgets.css
14 ms
settings
11 ms
117-60x60.jpg
982 ms
124-600x425.jpg
987 ms
collect
65 ms
popover.js
62 ms
sdk.js
359 ms
eCpfeMZI7q4jLksXVRWPQy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
38 ms
lJAvZoKA5NttpPc9yc6lPfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
39 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1111 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
5 ms
widgets.js
78 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1038 ms
123-600x352.jpg
1064 ms
122-600x433.jpg
924 ms
likebox.php
368 ms
120-600x525.jpg
887 ms
211141
132 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
146 ms
119-600x525.jpg
758 ms
ajax-loader.gif
856 ms
144 ms
xd_arbiter.php
141 ms
xd_arbiter.php
274 ms
main.css
84 ms
syndication
107 ms
663795385043931136
190 ms
css
78 ms
css
88 ms
hDvwL1_H7g-.css
226 ms
56WNbrUYLbL.css
260 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
345 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
420 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
367 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
366 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
35 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
37 ms
EgBlzoNBIHxNPCMwXaAhYPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
40 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
36 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
91 ms
3BBiGM4S_normal.jpg
74 ms
Cd1D7ZdVAAAV3F1.jpg:small
119 ms
Cd08_dcUYAEcIcG.jpg:small
72 ms
Cd066FvUAAEyVN9.jpg:small
78 ms
Cd0t3ZIUsAEv9me.jpg:small
77 ms
Cdq6NXPUMAAZIYN.jpg:small
77 ms
Cdq0VIFUEAAu3Sp.jpg:small
80 ms
Cdqva9qUEAAS_Ld.jpg:small
82 ms
CdqnfHoUEAAicjM.jpg:small
82 ms
CdbjQtHUkAARyWo.jpg:small
82 ms
CdbhyGsVAAAzM7q.jpg:small
83 ms
CdbVuCjUUAEuTPB.jpg:small
83 ms
CdXhQx5UUAIjVq3.jpg:small
112 ms
CdRkmh1VAAAuZwA.jpg:small
88 ms
CdRZcjXUEAA6Gw1.jpg:small
88 ms
CdRVQyGUMAIoXPV.jpg:small
108 ms
CdROpZ6VIAAIWGC.jpg:small
91 ms
CdHLSuhUYAEzAwq.jpg:small
92 ms
CdHFNuxVAAADv9w.jpg:small
126 ms
CdG_9n6UkAESC2S.jpg:small
91 ms
CdBhzSMUMAABtsr.jpg:small
92 ms
8 ms
12208599_695778893890702_3664545747119986531_n.jpg
235 ms
11665416_930990007000402_7844457713403196340_n.jpg
322 ms
540182_3970316889966_186142099_n.jpg
418 ms
12745771_104057306652975_6006586221278657014_n.jpg
404 ms
12573135_158090367900274_2985708069556880236_n.jpg
357 ms
12718252_984115664999007_7671602963670357272_n.jpg
514 ms
12728868_194203790936130_4543878260359984096_n.jpg
359 ms
12508912_1744155805805810_4106252660128435683_n.jpg
361 ms
11750632_124805957856714_7091241701638682413_n.jpg
398 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
49 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
50 ms
jot
23 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
53 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
80 ms
sugarwedding.com.ng SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sugarwedding.com.ng can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sugarwedding.com.ng main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sugarwedding.com.ng
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sugarwedding. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: