Tools & Wizards About Us
summarizingtool.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

summarizingtool.net

Summarizing Tool - Best AI Summary Generator

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

142 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

519 ms

summarizingtool.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to summarizingtool.net homepage info - get ready to check Summarizing Tool best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about summarizingtool.net

Our summarizing tool is the best AI summary generator that helps to summarize text, paragraphs, articles, and essays. This online summarizer is easy to use.

Visit summarizingtool.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Summarizingtool.net page load time and found that the first response time was 142 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

summarizingtool.net performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

88/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value12,450 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.227

55/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.8 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.summarizingtool.net

142 ms

adsbygoogle.js

155 ms

platform.js

64 ms

css2

75 ms

theme.min.css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Summarizingtool.net, 14% (9 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 13% (8 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (665 ms) belongs to the original domain Summarizingtool.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 289.9 kB (21%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Summarizingtool.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 942.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 51.0 kB

  • Original 66.1 kB
  • After minification 66.1 kB
  • After compression 15.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 43.7 kB

  • Original 312.9 kB
  • After minification 269.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Summarizing Tool needs image optimization as it can save up to 43.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 190.6 kB

  • Original 942.5 kB
  • After minification 942.4 kB
  • After compression 751.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 190.6 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 30.1 kB
  • After minification 30.1 kB
  • After compression 25.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Summarizingtool.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.5 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (55%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Summarizing Tool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.summarizingtool.net

www.summarizingtool.net

142 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

155 ms

platform.js

platform.js

64 ms

css2

css2

75 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

31 ms

style.css

style.css

76 ms

api.js

api.js

80 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

58 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

113 ms

script.js

script.js

77 ms

themify-icons.css

themify-icons.css

75 ms

summarize.js

summarize.js

77 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

169 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

193 ms

cadet_down.svg

cadet_down.svg

199 ms

Spin.gif

Spin.gif

200 ms

upload.svg

upload.svg

194 ms

tick_white.svg

tick_white.svg

197 ms

features_main_img1.svg

features_main_img1.svg

195 ms

summarize_img.svg

summarize_img.svg

224 ms

language.svg

language.svg

217 ms

play.svg

play.svg

221 ms

app.svg

app.svg

238 ms

1658922325what-is-the-difference-between-paraphrasing-and-summarizing-tool-png.png

1658922325what-is-the-difference-between-paraphrasing-and-summarizing-tool-png.png

241 ms

1652167128saac-method-for-summary-writing-png.png

1652167128saac-method-for-summary-writing-png.png

238 ms

16389613015-easy-summarizing-techniques-for-students-png.png

16389613015-easy-summarizing-techniques-for-students-png.png

665 ms

16287487187-tips-for-writing-effective-english-summaries-understanding-your-readers-png.png

16287487187-tips-for-writing-effective-english-summaries-understanding-your-readers-png.png

253 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

254 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

198 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

198 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

239 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

288 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

114 ms

themify.woff

themify.woff

584 ms

ads

ads

607 ms

ads

ads

476 ms

ads

ads

540 ms

ads

ads

471 ms

load_preloaded_resource.js

load_preloaded_resource.js

53 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

50 ms

s

s

12 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

50 ms

qs_click_protection.js

qs_click_protection.js

55 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

22 ms

e8fe9505a536d6b357c55aad9c4ec32b.js

e8fe9505a536d6b357c55aad9c4ec32b.js

11 ms

icon.png

icon.png

10 ms

reactive_library.js

reactive_library.js

156 ms

ca-pub-9589054196797961

ca-pub-9589054196797961

176 ms

css

css

32 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

24 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

24 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

24 ms

sodar

sodar

380 ms

activeview

activeview

365 ms

1zgHIv7PRgG-iYsx4Mp4gQSytzfgI2cd0hh8WxdX2bs.js

1zgHIv7PRgG-iYsx4Mp4gQSytzfgI2cd0hh8WxdX2bs.js

345 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

269 ms

feedback_grey600_24dp.png

feedback_grey600_24dp.png

256 ms

fullscreen_api_adapter.js

fullscreen_api_adapter.js

253 ms

interstitial_ad_frame.js

interstitial_ad_frame.js

257 ms

one_click_handler_one_afma.js

one_click_handler_one_afma.js

255 ms

2831499280703246021

2831499280703246021

87 ms

settings_grey600_24dp.png

settings_grey600_24dp.png

86 ms

css

css

91 ms

sodar2.js

sodar2.js

87 ms

Accessibility Review

summarizingtool.net accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

summarizingtool.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

summarizingtool.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Summarizingtool.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Summarizingtool.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

summarizingtool.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Summarizing Tool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: