Tools & Wizards About Us
supportivewomencare.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

supportivewomencare.com

Home | Supportive Women's Care

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

140 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

170 ms

supportivewomencare.com screenshot

About Website

Visit supportivewomencare.com now to see the best up-to-date Supportive Women Care content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about supportivewomencare.com

Specialist in Women's Health Care Yorktown Heights, NY Call Now Same Day Appointments Available About Services Accepted Insurance Contact Laura Mieszer ...

Visit supportivewomencare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Supportivewomencare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 140 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

supportivewomencare.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

supportivewomencare.com

140 ms

supportivewomencare.com

1548 ms

18df0cac5bd8ef8b9e2361b0fe9dbb2f.css

79 ms

8efbef13f317781b8e4055404cb63e8d.css

99 ms

b7d820a4d6b3968fafd4e5db36fe74e5.js

73 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Supportivewomencare.com, 48% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Supportivewomencare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 332.6 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Supportivewomencare.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 51.6 kB

  • Original 65.3 kB
  • After minification 63.4 kB
  • After compression 13.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 179.0 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Supportive Women Care needs image optimization as it can save up to 179.0 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 39 B

  • Original 173.0 kB
  • After minification 173.0 kB
  • After compression 172.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 101.9 kB

  • Original 108.4 kB
  • After minification 6.5 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Supportivewomencare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 101.9 kB or 94% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (53%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Supportive Women Care. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

supportivewomencare.com

supportivewomencare.com

140 ms

supportivewomencare.com

supportivewomencare.com

1548 ms

18df0cac5bd8ef8b9e2361b0fe9dbb2f.css

18df0cac5bd8ef8b9e2361b0fe9dbb2f.css

79 ms

8efbef13f317781b8e4055404cb63e8d.css

8efbef13f317781b8e4055404cb63e8d.css

99 ms

b7d820a4d6b3968fafd4e5db36fe74e5.js

b7d820a4d6b3968fafd4e5db36fe74e5.js

73 ms

532c7a36106f3bffc544bdf9234f575d.js

532c7a36106f3bffc544bdf9234f575d.js

74 ms

page-transitions.min.js

page-transitions.min.js

161 ms

7e0dc955dd833cf478dc7ac04781a8a3.js

7e0dc955dd833cf478dc7ac04781a8a3.js

159 ms

824292c87d43c45ec19bc7efe820c68c.js

824292c87d43c45ec19bc7efe820c68c.js

159 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

313 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

307 ms

e65de8d590481e328fe0b7ccef58ab12.js

e65de8d590481e328fe0b7ccef58ab12.js

215 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

187 ms

css

css

37 ms

2484cdc2affd6ecd8bbce34d469ab7f4.js

2484cdc2affd6ecd8bbce34d469ab7f4.js

151 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

34 ms

Logo-Services.png

Logo-Services.png

361 ms

Supportive-Womens-Care-Home-Hero.jpg

Supportive-Womens-Care-Home-Hero.jpg

336 ms

doctor.png

doctor.png

72 ms

logo_-womens-care-_B-1024x295.png

logo_-womens-care-_B-1024x295.png

136 ms

195 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

17 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

23 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

30 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

33 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

40 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

41 ms

4iCs6KV9e9dXjhoKfw7z.ttf

4iCs6KV9e9dXjhoKfw7z.ttf

41 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf

40 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf

39 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf

40 ms

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf

KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf

41 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf

46 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf

45 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

44 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

46 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

46 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

45 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

46 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

66 ms

Accessibility Review

supportivewomencare.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

supportivewomencare.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

supportivewomencare.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Supportivewomencare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Supportivewomencare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

supportivewomencare.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Supportive Women Care. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: