2.2 sec in total
146 ms
2 sec
85 ms
Welcome to supremejudicial.com homepage info - get ready to check Supreme Judicial best content right away, or after learning these important things about supremejudicial.com
40 years of experience and hundreds of thousands of completed jobs, Supremejudicial.com offers the most trusted Process Server solutions in New York.
Visit supremejudicial.comWe analyzed Supremejudicial.com page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
supremejudicial.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value4.0 s
49/100
25%
Value4.9 s
66/100
10%
Value560 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value9.9 s
27/100
10%
146 ms
54 ms
48 ms
1315 ms
79 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Supremejudicial.com, 42% (14 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 36% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 796.7 kB (66%)
1.2 MB
407.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Supremejudicial.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 744.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 603.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 603.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Supreme Judicial needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 190.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 190.0 kB or 43% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (56%)
18
8
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Supreme Judicial. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.supremejudicial.com
146 ms
minified.js
54 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
48 ms
polyfill.min.js
1315 ms
thunderbolt-commons.c1d8ed1c.bundle.min.js
79 ms
main.4a2d1e74.bundle.min.js
78 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
77 ms
lodash.min.js
77 ms
react.production.min.js
30 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
79 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
78 ms
45773f_2c16accad67d422fbcbf3ab737d4799b~mv2.png
214 ms
45773f_2d4ce6c373854e6290fbb7e738ea7319~mv2.png
351 ms
45773f_7c73a5b0f6a94b11a87408731f40e229f000.jpg
348 ms
bundle.min.js
72 ms
UC3ZEjagJi85gF9qFaBgIMITpqSvb0EhPNqvdm-qG4s.woff
36 ms
UC3ZEjagJi85gF9qFaBgIIidMZaDCgb76Cj_Fd30HHc.woff
37 ms
110 ms
114 ms
112 ms
110 ms
111 ms
107 ms
114 ms
111 ms
111 ms
106 ms
107 ms
107 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
6 ms
bolt-performance
28 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
11 ms
right-arrow.svg
12 ms
supremejudicial.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
supremejudicial.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
supremejudicial.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Supremejudicial.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Supremejudicial.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
supremejudicial.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Supreme Judicial. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: