Tools & Wizards About Us
suxing.me screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

suxing.me

苏醒 – 前端设计师 - WordPress主题开发者

Page Load Speed

48.6 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

46.6 sec

Page Rendered

572 ms

suxing.me screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Suxing content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about suxing.me

个人从事WordPress主题开发长达7年，是国内最早WordPress主题的开发者，创办的nicetheme奈思主题团队在国内当属一流WordPress开发团队之一

Visit suxing.me

Key Findings

We analyzed Suxing.me page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 47.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 7 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

suxing.me performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.7 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

suxing.me

1399 ms

www.suxing.me

6880 ms

style.css

12544 ms

font-awesome.min.css

1431 ms

style.css

3440 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Suxing.me, 12% (3 requests) were made to Hm.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Suxing.me.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 145.4 kB (56%)

Content Size

261.0 kB

After Optimization

115.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Suxing.me main page is 261.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 98.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 14.8 kB

  • Original 20.7 kB
  • After minification 19.1 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.8 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 68.4 kB
  • After minification 67.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Suxing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 51.5 kB

  • Original 73.1 kB
  • After minification 71.5 kB
  • After compression 21.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 51.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 78.0 kB

  • Original 98.8 kB
  • After minification 97.8 kB
  • After compression 20.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Suxing.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (38%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Suxing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

suxing.me

suxing.me

1399 ms

www.suxing.me

www.suxing.me

6880 ms

style.css

style.css

12544 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1431 ms

style.css

style.css

3440 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

5094 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

3664 ms

index.js

index.js

2447 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

3425 ms

suxingme.js

suxingme.js

5093 ms

fastclick.min.js

fastclick.min.js

20349 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

16569 ms

noise.jpg

noise.jpg

14150 ms

logo.png

logo.png

3250 ms

me.png

me.png

509 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

19731 ms

Safari.png

Safari.png

3384 ms

2016011717325182.jpg

2016011717325182.jpg

19731 ms

2015122607211745.jpg

2015122607211745.jpg

19731 ms

2015122607305870.jpg

2015122607305870.jpg

19731 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

19732 ms

hm.js

hm.js

1521 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

19587 ms

hm.gif

hm.gif

263 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

5848 ms

hm.gif

hm.gif

720 ms

Accessibility Review

suxing.me accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

suxing.me best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

suxing.me SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Suxing.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Suxing.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

suxing.me

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Suxing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: