Tools & Wizards About Us
swc.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

swc.com

BDO Digital | Technology Solutions for Mid Market Companies

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

40 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

553 ms

swc.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Swc content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about swc.com

BDO Digital helps middle market businesses capture the full power of technology through digital services and comprehensive IT solutions. Explore services.

Visit swc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Swc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

swc.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value32.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,380 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value31.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

swc.com

40 ms

www.swc.com

36 ms

www.swc.com

1082 ms

shadowbox.css

18 ms

shadowbox.js

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Swc.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Swc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (72%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

661.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Swc.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 72.1 kB

  • Original 87.1 kB
  • After minification 84.2 kB
  • After compression 15.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 263.3 kB
  • After minification 262.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Swc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 600.5 kB

  • Original 857.3 kB
  • After minification 820.5 kB
  • After compression 256.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 600.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 127.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Swc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (56%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

32

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Swc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

swc.com

swc.com

40 ms

www.swc.com

www.swc.com

36 ms

www.swc.com

www.swc.com

1082 ms

shadowbox.css

shadowbox.css

18 ms

shadowbox.js

shadowbox.js

39 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

78 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

75 ms

magnific.css

magnific.css

84 ms

style.css

style.css

65 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

92 ms

masterslider.main.css

masterslider.main.css

86 ms

custom.css

custom.css

84 ms

shiftnav.css

shiftnav.css

121 ms

ubermenu.min.css

ubermenu.min.css

122 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

119 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

126 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

124 ms

snazzymaps.js

snazzymaps.js

127 ms

responsive-modernizr.js

responsive-modernizr.js

127 ms

magnific.min.js

magnific.min.js

128 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

128 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

127 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

142 ms

strap-extras.js

strap-extras.js

141 ms

api.js

api.js

143 ms

front_style.css

front_style.css

139 ms

responsive-scripts.js

responsive-scripts.js

138 ms

responsive-plugins.js

responsive-plugins.js

137 ms

shiftnav.js

shiftnav.js

137 ms

js

js

140 ms

ubermenu.min.js

ubermenu.min.js

152 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

150 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

151 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

150 ms

masterslider.min.js

masterslider.min.js

150 ms

skrollr.min.js

skrollr.min.js

150 ms

classie.js

classie.js

156 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

107 ms

style.css

style.css

108 ms

css

css

122 ms

prum.min.js

prum.min.js

347 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

364 ms

logo-color.png

logo-color.png

37 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

37 ms

icon-about-homepage-ms.png

icon-about-homepage-ms.png

37 ms

icon-about-homepage-software-solutions.png

icon-about-homepage-software-solutions.png

35 ms

icon-about-homepage-infrastructure.png

icon-about-homepage-infrastructure.png

36 ms

icon-about-homepage-digital-marketing.png

icon-about-homepage-digital-marketing.png

35 ms

logo-integrity-payment-systems.png

logo-integrity-payment-systems.png

337 ms

logo-hello-world.png

logo-hello-world.png

337 ms

HAVI-Logo.png

HAVI-Logo.png

337 ms

M-Holland-Logo.png

M-Holland-Logo.png

337 ms

logo-mutual-trust.png

logo-mutual-trust.png

337 ms

logo-emkay.png

logo-emkay.png

335 ms

logo-northwestern-universtiy.png

logo-northwestern-universtiy.png

343 ms

logo-griffith-laboratories.png

logo-griffith-laboratories.png

344 ms

logo-belt-railway.png

logo-belt-railway.png

342 ms

logo-waterton.png

logo-waterton.png

342 ms

Tandem-HR-Logo.png

Tandem-HR-Logo.png

342 ms

logo-sg360.png

logo-sg360.png

342 ms

career-award-crains.png

career-award-crains.png

349 ms

career-award-bestbrightest.png

career-award-bestbrightest.png

349 ms

career-award-inc500.png

career-award-inc500.png

353 ms

logo-full.png

logo-full.png

350 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

434 ms

banners-large-careertype.jpg

banners-large-careertype.jpg

352 ms

v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf

v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf

348 ms

nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf

nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf

399 ms

DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf

DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf

401 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

349 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

348 ms

loading-2.gif

loading-2.gif

34 ms

banner-placeholder-blurry.jpg

banner-placeholder-blurry.jpg

34 ms

banner-homepage-video.jpg

banner-homepage-video.jpg

112 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

40 ms

4918.js

4918.js

57 ms

collect

collect

23 ms

s

s

44 ms

u

u

22 ms

frs-next.js

frs-next.js

46 ms

beacon.gif

beacon.gif

385 ms

Accessibility Review

swc.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

[role] values are not valid

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

swc.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

swc.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Swc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Swc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

swc.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Swc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: