Tools & Wizards About Us
symbolclick.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 98

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 56

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

symbolclick.com

XML Marker Free XML Editor and Json Editor - XML Marker

Page Load Speed

637 ms in total

First Response

47 ms

Resources Loaded

189 ms

Page Rendered

401 ms

symbolclick.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Symbolclick content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about symbolclick.com

A fast and easy source-level XML and Json Editor, XML Marker uses a combination of syntax-highlighting editor, tree view, and table views to help you get a better insight to your XML code

Visit symbolclick.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Symbolclick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 47 ms and then it took 590 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

symbolclick.com performance score

98

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

symbolclick.com

47 ms

symbolclick.com

51 ms

style2.css

2 ms

bootstrap.min.css

26 ms

script.js

9 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Symbolclick.com, 8% (1 request) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (51 ms) belongs to the original domain Symbolclick.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 41.4 kB (80%)

Content Size

51.5 kB

After Optimization

10.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Symbolclick.com main page is 51.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 25.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 23.7 kB
  • After minification 23.1 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-98%

Potential reduce by 24.5 kB

  • Original 25.1 kB
  • After minification 605 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Symbolclick needs image optimization as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 98% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 128 B

  • Original 242 B
  • After minification 150 B
  • After compression 114 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 128 B or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 345 B

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 2.4 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Symbolclick.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 345 B or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Symbolclick. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

symbolclick.com

symbolclick.com

47 ms

symbolclick.com

symbolclick.com

51 ms

style2.css

style2.css

2 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

26 ms

script.js

script.js

9 ms

cart.png

cart.png

10 ms

marker2_logo.png

marker2_logo.png

4 ms

logo.png

logo.png

3 ms

folder.gif

folder.gif

6 ms

page_text.gif

page_text.gif

5 ms

chkmark4.gif

chkmark4.gif

6 ms

intro2.gif

intro2.gif

6 ms

Accessibility Review

symbolclick.com accessibility score

56

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

symbolclick.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

symbolclick.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Symbolclick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Symbolclick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

symbolclick.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Symbolclick. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: