Tools & Wizards About Us
syslog-monitoring.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

syslog-monitoring.com

Syslog Analyzer Software, Firewall Syslog Analyzer - Syslog Analyzer

Page Load Speed

21.5 sec in total

First Response

288 ms

Resources Loaded

20.8 sec

Page Rendered

434 ms

syslog-monitoring.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Syslog Monitoring content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about syslog-monitoring.com

Nagios Log Server is a powerful enterprise-class syslog analyzer software used for log monitoring & linux syslog analysis allowing users to quickly & easily perform syslog analysis.

Visit syslog-monitoring.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Syslog-monitoring.com page load time and found that the first response time was 288 ms and then it took 21.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

syslog-monitoring.com performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

65/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value370 ms

71/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

syslog-monitoring.com

288 ms

gtm.js

83 ms

style.css

32 ms

font-awesome.min.css

77 ms

css

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Syslog-monitoring.com, 18% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (5 requests) were made to Assets.nagios.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) relates to the external source Affiliate.nagios.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 39.7 kB (3%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Syslog-monitoring.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 31.7 kB

  • Original 39.9 kB
  • After minification 27.3 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.7 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 23 B

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Syslog Monitoring images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 133.7 kB
  • After minification 133.6 kB
  • After compression 126.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 703 B

  • Original 32.8 kB
  • After minification 32.8 kB
  • After compression 32.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Syslog-monitoring.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (68%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Syslog Monitoring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

syslog-monitoring.com

syslog-monitoring.com

288 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

83 ms

style.css

style.css

32 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

77 ms

css

css

28 ms

A.quick-style.css,,qver==4.0+preset1.css,,qver==4.0+prettyPhoto.css,,qver==4.0,Mcc.iLVjlUb939.css.pagespeed.cf.ZkIofTqrHt.css

A.quick-style.css,,qver==4.0+preset1.css,,qver==4.0+prettyPhoto.css,,qver==4.0,Mcc.iLVjlUb939.css.pagespeed.cf.ZkIofTqrHt.css

102 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

104 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

75 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

77 ms

SmoothScroll.js

SmoothScroll.js

77 ms

jquery.scrollTo.js

jquery.scrollTo.js

120 ms

jquery.nav.js

jquery.nav.js

120 ms

jquery.parallax.js

jquery.parallax.js

118 ms

main.js

main.js

119 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

121 ms

prettyphoto-custom.js

prettyphoto-custom.js

122 ms

A.cookieconsent.min.css.pagespeed.cf.6hLUlhwbFs.css

A.cookieconsent.min.css.pagespeed.cf.6hLUlhwbFs.css

76 ms

cookieconsent.min.js.pagespeed.ce.8rwIBJIJdM.js

cookieconsent.min.js.pagespeed.ce.8rwIBJIJdM.js

120 ms

3796979.js

3796979.js

54 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

112 ms

main.css

main.css

108 ms

css

css

13 ms

css

css

16 ms

A.cookieconsent.min.css.pagespeed.cf.6hLUlhwbFs.css

A.cookieconsent.min.css.pagespeed.cf.6hLUlhwbFs.css

195 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

60 ms

cookieconsent.min.js.pagespeed.ce.8rwIBJIJdM.js

cookieconsent.min.js.pagespeed.ce.8rwIBJIJdM.js

185 ms

trackjs.js

trackjs.js

20225 ms

nagioslogserver_logo_small.png

nagioslogserver_logo_small.png

131 ms

xnls-screenshots-top.png.pagespeed.ic.97tKT8zE3M.png

xnls-screenshots-top.png.pagespeed.ic.97tKT8zE3M.png

215 ms

x1.png.pagespeed.ic.Ym1dExnXNg.png

x1.png.pagespeed.ic.Ym1dExnXNg.png

167 ms

x3.png.pagespeed.ic.vW0iLjcM-z.png

x3.png.pagespeed.ic.vW0iLjcM-z.png

169 ms

x2.png.pagespeed.ic.V_Kfv35ZN5.png

x2.png.pagespeed.ic.V_Kfv35ZN5.png

137 ms

x8.png.pagespeed.ic.GDpj6n_E3F.png

x8.png.pagespeed.ic.GDpj6n_E3F.png

142 ms

collect

collect

22 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

17 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff

32 ms

font

font

164 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrc.woff

57 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrc.woff

57 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrc.woff

33 ms

font

font

61 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrc.woff

60 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrc.woff

33 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

98 ms

collect

collect

58 ms

js

js

104 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

86 ms

banner.js

banner.js

97 ms

3796979.js

3796979.js

103 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

56 ms

fb.js

fb.js

52 ms

Accessibility Review

syslog-monitoring.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

syslog-monitoring.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

syslog-monitoring.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Syslog-monitoring.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Syslog-monitoring.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

syslog-monitoring.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Syslog Monitoring. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: