Tools & Wizards About Us
systematic-reviews.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

systematic-reviews.com

Kleijnen Systematic Reviews

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

743 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

432 ms

systematic-reviews.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Systematic Reviews content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about systematic-reviews.com

Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (KSR) Ltd. Independent research company producing systematic reviews, analyses and health technology assessments.

Visit systematic-reviews.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Systematic-reviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 743 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

systematic-reviews.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.06

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.systematic-reviews.com

743 ms

main.min.css

84 ms

gdpr-main.css

165 ms

main.min.js

403 ms

jquery.min.js

315 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Systematic-reviews.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (743 ms) belongs to the original domain Systematic-reviews.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 67.6 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Systematic-reviews.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 60.5 kB

  • Original 76.6 kB
  • After minification 67.2 kB
  • After compression 16.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.0 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Systematic Reviews images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 102 B

  • Original 98.2 kB
  • After minification 98.2 kB
  • After compression 98.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 18.9 kB
  • After minification 18.9 kB
  • After compression 18.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Systematic-reviews.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (14%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Systematic Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.systematic-reviews.com

www.systematic-reviews.com

743 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

84 ms

gdpr-main.css

gdpr-main.css

165 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

403 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

315 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

248 ms

main.js

main.js

332 ms

KSR-Logo-1.png

KSR-Logo-1.png

99 ms

banner-1.jpg

banner-1.jpg

327 ms

systematic-reviews.svg

systematic-reviews.svg

102 ms

health-technology-assessments.svg

health-technology-assessments.svg

103 ms

cost-effectiveness-analyses.svg

cost-effectiveness-analyses.svg

100 ms

guidelines.svg

guidelines.svg

101 ms

information-specialist-services.svg

information-specialist-services.svg

158 ms

training-courses.svg

training-courses.svg

160 ms

canvas.png

canvas.png

165 ms

news-thumbnail.png

news-thumbnail.png

169 ms

ksr-logo.svg

ksr-logo.svg

344 ms

inter-thin-webfont.woff

inter-thin-webfont.woff

238 ms

inter-regular-webfont.woff

inter-regular-webfont.woff

164 ms

inter-light-webfont.woff

inter-light-webfont.woff

253 ms

iStock-1346063241-scaled.jpg

iStock-1346063241-scaled.jpg

549 ms

Copy-of-TEMPLATE-round-up-featured-image.png

Copy-of-TEMPLATE-round-up-featured-image.png

229 ms

ksr-banner-5-320x320.jpg

ksr-banner-5-320x320.jpg

293 ms

Copy-of-TEMPLATE-round-up-featured-image.png

Copy-of-TEMPLATE-round-up-featured-image.png

297 ms

TEMPLATE-round-up-featured-image-1.png

TEMPLATE-round-up-featured-image-1.png

298 ms

Accessibility Review

systematic-reviews.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

systematic-reviews.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

systematic-reviews.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Systematic-reviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Systematic-reviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

systematic-reviews.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Systematic Reviews. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: