Tools & Wizards About Us
test.scentbird.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

test.scentbird.com

Scentbird Monthly Perfume Subscription Box: Designer Scents $16.95

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

86 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

test.scentbird.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Test Scentbird content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about test.scentbird.com

Discover the latest perfumes and colognes at Scentbird. Date perfumes before marrying them. Explore over 600 designer fragrances. Get new designer scent every month for just $16.95. Free shipping.

Visit test.scentbird.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Test.scentbird.com page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

test.scentbird.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,600 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

test.scentbird.com

86 ms

test.scentbird.com

1369 ms

2m5RBodjIoAHfTY0SPKRLIyj7RA.js

26 ms

styles.7ae461a1.css

39 ms

runtime.78718d23.js

343 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Test.scentbird.com, 81% (61 requests) were made to Cdn.scentbird.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Imgcdn.scentbird.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Test.scentbird.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 149.5 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Test.scentbird.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 953.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 145.1 kB

  • Original 184.9 kB
  • After minification 184.9 kB
  • After compression 39.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 145.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 953.5 kB
  • After minification 952.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Test Scentbird images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 508.9 kB
  • After minification 508.9 kB
  • After compression 505.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 21.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (71%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Test Scentbird. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

test.scentbird.com

test.scentbird.com

86 ms

test.scentbird.com

test.scentbird.com

1369 ms

2m5RBodjIoAHfTY0SPKRLIyj7RA.js

2m5RBodjIoAHfTY0SPKRLIyj7RA.js

26 ms

styles.7ae461a1.css

styles.7ae461a1.css

39 ms

runtime.78718d23.js

runtime.78718d23.js

343 ms

npm.core-js.33462b8b.js

npm.core-js.33462b8b.js

37 ms

sentry.8eba58ed.js

sentry.8eba58ed.js

37 ms

faro.2860c9ad.js

faro.2860c9ad.js

37 ms

components.dataDisplay.3c29aade.js

components.dataDisplay.3c29aade.js

36 ms

helpers.5bb39cbc.js

helpers.5bb39cbc.js

454 ms

components.inputs.a4337675.js

components.inputs.a4337675.js

60 ms

hooks.8ec30cb1.js

hooks.8ec30cb1.js

65 ms

components.layout.8e0f0ed6.js

components.layout.8e0f0ed6.js

64 ms

components.feedback.36aa2498.js

components.feedback.36aa2498.js

72 ms

components.navigation.3502aa41.js

components.navigation.3502aa41.js

66 ms

loc.links.3b4be997.js

loc.links.3b4be997.js

67 ms

loc.apollo-client.815f4e18.js

loc.apollo-client.815f4e18.js

72 ms

loc.crypto-helpers.2967b3b4.js

loc.crypto-helpers.2967b3b4.js

67 ms

modules.user.shipping.b0c4c786.js

modules.user.shipping.b0c4c786.js

67 ms

npm.react.2273d164.js

npm.react.2273d164.js

68 ms

modules.user.f28628fe.js

modules.user.f28628fe.js

70 ms

modules.subscription.5376849b.js

modules.subscription.5376849b.js

73 ms

modules.cart.d4fd04bb.js

modules.cart.d4fd04bb.js

72 ms

loc.80bdc4cc.js

loc.80bdc4cc.js

74 ms

npm.0d339a86.js

npm.0d339a86.js

75 ms

client.a040c349.js

client.a040c349.js

77 ms

loc.date.173da95c.chunk.js

loc.date.173da95c.chunk.js

73 ms

compositions.Header.e60648ad.chunk.js

compositions.Header.e60648ad.chunk.js

77 ms

compositions.Footer.01b787b0.chunk.js

compositions.Footer.01b787b0.chunk.js

75 ms

modules.subscription.subscriptionAddons.184620c8.chunk.js

modules.subscription.subscriptionAddons.184620c8.chunk.js

79 ms

modules.products.8c366033.chunk.js

modules.products.8c366033.chunk.js

77 ms

modules.brands.620aa4fc.chunk.js

modules.brands.620aa4fc.chunk.js

81 ms

layouts-LandingLayout-LandingLayout.c148725e.chunk.js

layouts-LandingLayout-LandingLayout.c148725e.chunk.js

81 ms

compositions.buttons.UnskipButton.0f033b78.chunk.js

compositions.buttons.UnskipButton.0f033b78.chunk.js

80 ms

components.ada.721df396.chunk.js

components.ada.721df396.chunk.js

80 ms

modules.subscription.resubscribe.5d6b9c59.chunk.js

modules.subscription.resubscribe.5d6b9c59.chunk.js

92 ms

modules.coupon.c4ce484f.chunk.js

modules.coupon.c4ce484f.chunk.js

92 ms

modules.banners.2aa1f7b5.chunk.js

modules.banners.2aa1f7b5.chunk.js

92 ms

compositions-Header-view-Desktop-Desktop.b050c1eb.chunk.js

compositions-Header-view-Desktop-Desktop.b050c1eb.chunk.js

92 ms

compositions.buttons.AddToButton.bff33517.chunk.js

compositions.buttons.AddToButton.bff33517.chunk.js

449 ms

compositions.productCards.8b6891ff.chunk.js

compositions.productCards.8b6891ff.chunk.js

384 ms

compositions.productLists.bfe13ca5.chunk.js

compositions.productLists.bfe13ca5.chunk.js

66 ms

mixpanel-2-latest.min.js

mixpanel-2-latest.min.js

154 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

962 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

176 ms

tags.js

tags.js

55 ms

ZnJvbnRiaXJkMi9pbWFnZXMvZGVza3RvcC1oZXJvX2I0OGQ0OS5qcGc=

ZnJvbnRiaXJkMi9pbWFnZXMvZGVza3RvcC1oZXJvX2I0OGQ0OS5qcGc=

156 ms

compositions.landings.97ba1f0a.chunk.js

compositions.landings.97ba1f0a.chunk.js

44 ms

ZnJvbnRiaXJkMi9pbWFnZXMvYnJhbmRzXzg1NTFjZS5wbmc=

ZnJvbnRiaXJkMi9pbWFnZXMvYnJhbmRzXzg1NTFjZS5wbmc=

163 ms

ZnJvbnRiaXJkMi9pbWFnZXMvYmctMC1kZXNrdG9wX2FlZjI2MS5qcGc=

ZnJvbnRiaXJkMi9pbWFnZXMvYmctMC1kZXNrdG9wX2FlZjI2MS5qcGc=

176 ms

ZnJvbnRiaXJkMi9pbWFnZXMvYnJhbmRzLWRlc2t0b3BfNTBiNTQ3LnBuZw==

ZnJvbnRiaXJkMi9pbWFnZXMvYnJhbmRzLWRlc2t0b3BfNTBiNTQ3LnBuZw==

167 ms

ZnJvbnRiaXJkMi9pbWFnZXMvYmctZGVza3RvcF9lNTFmNjYuanBn

ZnJvbnRiaXJkMi9pbWFnZXMvYmctZGVza3RvcF9lNTFmNjYuanBn

179 ms

ZnJvbnRiaXJkMi9pbWFnZXMvYmctZGVza3RvcF81MDUyZjAuanBn

ZnJvbnRiaXJkMi9pbWFnZXMvYmctZGVza3RvcF81MDUyZjAuanBn

833 ms

modules.queue.04977fe7.chunk.js

modules.queue.04977fe7.chunk.js

434 ms

modules.recommendations.e6c04dc5.chunk.js

modules.recommendations.e6c04dc5.chunk.js

43 ms

pages-landing-LandingPage-LandingPage.05a98259.chunk.js

pages-landing-LandingPage-LandingPage.05a98259.chunk.js

46 ms

components-HowItWorksSectionWithAnimations-HowItWorksSectionWithAnimations.9c203a0e.chunk.js

components-HowItWorksSectionWithAnimations-HowItWorksSectionWithAnimations.9c203a0e.chunk.js

133 ms

bottles_b62b4b.gif

bottles_b62b4b.gif

133 ms

cart_fa7c93.gif

cart_fa7c93.gif

133 ms

case_6b99fd.gif

case_6b99fd.gif

133 ms

handshake_686bd1.gif

handshake_686bd1.gif

133 ms

glamour_65af54.svg

glamour_65af54.svg

131 ms

vogue_a864f0.svg

vogue_a864f0.svg

131 ms

gq_fe6060.svg

gq_fe6060.svg

132 ms

esquire_5388d4.svg

esquire_5388d4.svg

132 ms

buzzfeed_52c33d.svg

buzzfeed_52c33d.svg

411 ms

instyle_336400.svg

instyle_336400.svg

605 ms

sofia-pro-regular.woff

sofia-pro-regular.woff

212 ms

sofia-pro-medium.woff

sofia-pro-medium.woff

218 ms

sofia-pro-light.woff

sofia-pro-light.woff

240 ms

sofia-pro-semibold.woff

sofia-pro-semibold.woff

241 ms

sofia-pro-bold.woff

sofia-pro-bold.woff

241 ms

tt-norms-pro-bold.woff

tt-norms-pro-bold.woff

242 ms

tt-norms-pro-medium.woff

tt-norms-pro-medium.woff

242 ms

15 ms

Accessibility Review

test.scentbird.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

test.scentbird.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

test.scentbird.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Test.scentbird.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Test.scentbird.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

test.scentbird.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Test Scentbird. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: