Tools & Wizards About Us
test.sightmill.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

test.sightmill.com

[TEST] SightMill Helps You Measure Customer Satisfaction With Net Promoter Score

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

179 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

269 ms

test.sightmill.com screenshot

About Website

Visit test.sightmill.com now to see the best up-to-date TEST Sight Mill content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about test.sightmill.com

SightMill Net Promoter Score software makes it easy to measure and improve customer satisfaction and employee engagement by email, SMS, website, training events

Visit test.sightmill.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Test.sightmill.com page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

test.sightmill.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,050 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.3 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

test.sightmill.com

179 ms

test.sightmill.com

397 ms

js

67 ms

modernizr.min.js

83 ms

jquery.min.js

237 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Test.sightmill.com, 10% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (846 ms) relates to the external source Storage.googleapis.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 55.1 kB (12%)

Content Size

445.4 kB

After Optimization

390.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Test.sightmill.com main page is 445.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 270.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 47.1 kB

  • Original 58.9 kB
  • After minification 52.0 kB
  • After compression 11.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 11.9 kB
  • After minification 10.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, TEST Sight Mill needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 270.5 kB
  • After minification 270.5 kB
  • After compression 266.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 104.1 kB
  • After minification 104.1 kB
  • After compression 101.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Test.sightmill.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (46%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

35

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TEST Sight Mill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

test.sightmill.com

test.sightmill.com

179 ms

test.sightmill.com

test.sightmill.com

397 ms

js

js

67 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

83 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

237 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

230 ms

js

js

101 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

314 ms

plugins.css

plugins.css

307 ms

main.css

main.css

230 ms

themes.css

themes.css

233 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

34 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

43 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

454 ms

app.js

app.js

305 ms

css

css

48 ms

icon32.png

icon32.png

542 ms

b08e87f132e2df14e4a86c45c626d137.png

b08e87f132e2df14e4a86c45c626d137.png

32 ms

home-page.webp

home-page.webp

124 ms

ask.webp

ask.webp

125 ms

analyze.webp

analyze.webp

187 ms

act.webp

act.webp

187 ms

verbatim-meta.webp

verbatim-meta.webp

187 ms

the-aa-logo.webp

the-aa-logo.webp

209 ms

bride.webp

bride.webp

208 ms

fastcase.webp

fastcase.webp

211 ms

legalgeneral.webp

legalgeneral.webp

210 ms

lexis.webp

lexis.webp

210 ms

mailzinger.webp

mailzinger.webp

329 ms

relx-logo.webp

relx-logo.webp

329 ms

skorch.webp

skorch.webp

306 ms

tolley.webp

tolley.webp

332 ms

uni-herts.webp

uni-herts.webp

332 ms

integrations2.webp

integrations2.webp

332 ms

nps2.webp

nps2.webp

653 ms

152de066-6ccf-11e8-ab19-00505625fa1d.js

152de066-6ccf-11e8-ab19-00505625fa1d.js

589 ms

GMmPg1xfFO0

GMmPg1xfFO0

163 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

108 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

123 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

135 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

136 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

495 ms

467b1cff-8548-42e3-8ea1-a6f04a4c267a.js

467b1cff-8548-42e3-8ea1-a6f04a4c267a.js

846 ms

widget

widget

721 ms

ss.js

ss.js

444 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

62 ms

qevents.js

qevents.js

122 ms

lftracker_v1_kn9Eq4RdvNj8RlvP.js

lftracker_v1_kn9Eq4RdvNj8RlvP.js

449 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

47 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

68 ms

base.js

base.js

111 ms

pixel

pixel

36 ms

pixel

pixel

36 ms

id

id

180 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

175 ms

Create

Create

148 ms

qoe

qoe

120 ms

s9i9Iyk4Y_s1LD6aqz2X9kjqPppJUVpoTsMZDucYENo.js

s9i9Iyk4Y_s1LD6aqz2X9kjqPppJUVpoTsMZDucYENo.js

116 ms

embed.js

embed.js

46 ms

152de066-6ccf-11e8-ab19-00505625fa1d.html

152de066-6ccf-11e8-ab19-00505625fa1d.html

81 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

24 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

24 ms

GMmPg1xfFO0

GMmPg1xfFO0

129 ms

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

18 ms

koi

koi

144 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

111 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

107 ms

tr-rc.lfeeder.com

tr-rc.lfeeder.com

207 ms

s9i9Iyk4Y_s1LD6aqz2X9kjqPppJUVpoTsMZDucYENo.js

s9i9Iyk4Y_s1LD6aqz2X9kjqPppJUVpoTsMZDucYENo.js

76 ms

outline_1c.png

outline_1c.png

154 ms

outline_3c.png

outline_3c.png

140 ms

outline_5c.png

outline_5c.png

282 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

17 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

26 ms

website

website

413 ms

id

id

21 ms

Create

Create

110 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

21 ms

Lato-Light.woff

Lato-Light.woff

5 ms

ServiceGetConfig

ServiceGetConfig

157 ms

floatbutton1_0uA5KIDjSJBNGPeiRDI3YtNcjWJ9mZsPq48NM5iMzp7_jWYVkIHbMtgrDX_xil60_.css

floatbutton1_0uA5KIDjSJBNGPeiRDI3YtNcjWJ9mZsPq48NM5iMzp7_jWYVkIHbMtgrDX_xil60_.css

123 ms

floatbutton1_gagAduz5tiLSaBz7XRSC6p-M4kbireaUx12UCBqdoxV8brFf-iczAg0VKg-2ght8_.js

floatbutton1_gagAduz5tiLSaBz7XRSC6p-M4kbireaUx12UCBqdoxV8brFf-iczAg0VKg-2ght8_.js

180 ms

Accessibility Review

test.sightmill.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

test.sightmill.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

test.sightmill.com SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Test.sightmill.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Test.sightmill.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

test.sightmill.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of TEST Sight Mill. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: