6 sec in total
2.5 sec
3.3 sec
215 ms
Click here to check amazing Transcription Servicesreview content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about transcription.servicesreview.net
Read transcription services reviews, compare transcription companies and choose your best transcription service with the most affordable rates.
Visit transcription.servicesreview.netWe analyzed Transcription.servicesreview.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
transcription.servicesreview.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
94/100
10%
Value1.7 s
99/100
25%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
2456 ms
169 ms
23 ms
205 ms
139 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Transcription.servicesreview.net, 7% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Transcription.servicesreview.net.
Page size can be reduced by 590.9 kB (54%)
1.1 MB
508.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Transcription.servicesreview.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 709.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Transcription Servicesreview needs image optimization as it can save up to 41.6 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 447.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 447.9 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Transcription.servicesreview.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (51%)
70
34
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Transcription Servicesreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
transcription.servicesreview.net
2456 ms
style.css
169 ms
css
23 ms
jquery.min.js
205 ms
custom.js
139 ms
jqueryslidemenu.js
141 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
140 ms
jquery.rating.css
201 ms
global.css
204 ms
styles.css
199 ms
jquery.js
272 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
221 ms
magical-javascript-thing.js
260 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
287 ms
jquery.MetaData.js
265 ms
jquery.rating.pack.js
291 ms
jtip.js
292 ms
jscolor.js
326 ms
tw-sack.min.js
332 ms
js
26 ms
defaults.css
335 ms
table-styles.css
350 ms
show_ads.js
9 ms
addthis_widget.js
19 ms
jquery.color.min.js
257 ms
comment-reply.min.js
253 ms
jquery.form.min.js
305 ms
scripts.js
334 ms
style.css
268 ms
nivo-slider.css
71 ms
ga.js
71 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
111 ms
bg.jpg
211 ms
feed.png
118 ms
logo.png
117 ms
1.png
118 ms
2.png
118 ms
3.png
181 ms
4.png
185 ms
5.png
185 ms
UKTranscription.com-Review-150x150.png
238 ms
ABSTranscribe.com-Review-125x125.png
185 ms
Nuance.com-Review-150x150.png
262 ms
TranscriptionLive.com-Review-125x125.png
234 ms
logo.png
227 ms
ca-pub-7820300266812490.js
113 ms
zrt_lookup.html
172 ms
show_ads_impl.js
72 ms
bg-nav.gif
222 ms
bg-search.png
243 ms
search-btn.png
288 ms
bg-shadow-top.png
305 ms
default-star.png
291 ms
visit-site.png
292 ms
bg-sb.png
310 ms
bg-sb-top.png
315 ms
__utm.gif
106 ms
0IZPA9DbzKXnGZABsAivT50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
107 ms
ads
174 ms
bg-sb-bot.png
305 ms
osd.js
65 ms
300lo.json
30 ms
ads
165 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
29 ms
6067654699134818064
138 ms
abg.js
71 ms
m_js_controller.js
86 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
31 ms
8455766100897649144
72 ms
s
45 ms
x_button_blue2.png
51 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
11 ms
transcription.servicesreview.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
transcription.servicesreview.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
transcription.servicesreview.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Transcription.servicesreview.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Transcription.servicesreview.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
transcription.servicesreview.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Transcription Servicesreview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: