1 sec in total
176 ms
716 ms
125 ms
Visit tripod.swarthmore.edu now to see the best up-to-date Tripod Swarthmore content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tripod.swarthmore.edu
Visit tripod.swarthmore.eduWe analyzed Tripod.swarthmore.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 176 ms and then it took 841 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
tripod.swarthmore.edu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.1 s
0/100
10%
Value14.8 s
0/100
25%
Value12.2 s
3/100
10%
Value2,290 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value18.5 s
3/100
10%
176 ms
49 ms
185 ms
49 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tripod.swarthmore.edu, 90% (27 requests) were made to Tripod.brynmawr.edu and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (185 ms) relates to the external source Tripod.brynmawr.edu.
Page size can be reduced by 336.7 kB (67%)
503.6 kB
166.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Tripod.swarthmore.edu main page is 503.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 212.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.7 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tripod Swarthmore needs image optimization as it can save up to 17.8 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 135.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 135.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 165.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tripod.swarthmore.edu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 165.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (48%)
27
14
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tripod Swarthmore. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tripod.swarthmore.edu
176 ms
tripod.brynmawr.edu
49 ms
185 ms
compiled.css
49 ms
font-awesome.min.css
26 ms
bootstrap-slider.css
21 ms
style.css
26 ms
jquery.min.js
40 ms
bootstrap.min.js
28 ms
bootstrap-accessibility.min.js
37 ms
typeahead.js
79 ms
validator.min.js
44 ms
rc4.js
45 ms
common.js
94 ms
lightbox.js
96 ms
topnav.js
97 ms
analytics.js
35 ms
logo.jpg
29 ms
nav_down_arrow.png
24 ms
nav_up_arrow.png
33 ms
servicesbg.jpg
38 ms
activeTab_bg.png
36 ms
help.png
34 ms
red.gif
42 ms
blue.gif
46 ms
yellow.gif
49 ms
magnifyglass.png
54 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
64 ms
collect
20 ms
print.css
41 ms
tripod.swarthmore.edu accessibility score
tripod.swarthmore.edu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
tripod.swarthmore.edu SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tripod.swarthmore.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Tripod.swarthmore.edu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tripod.swarthmore.edu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tripod Swarthmore. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: