Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

v3-hotfix-1.screencast-o-matic.com

ScreenPal (Formerly Screencast-O-Matic) | Screen Recorder & Video Editor

Page Load Speed

7.1 sec in total

First Response

16 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

4.2 sec

v3-hotfix-1.screencast-o-matic.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to v3-hotfix-1.screencast-o-matic.com homepage info - get ready to check V 3 Hotfix 1 Screencast O Matic best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about v3-hotfix-1.screencast-o-matic.com

At ScreenPal, we don’t believe that video recording and editing should be difficult, or cost a fortune. Our simple and intuitive tools help you get the job done easily.

Visit v3-hotfix-1.screencast-o-matic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed V3-hotfix-1.screencast-o-matic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

v3-hotfix-1.screencast-o-matic.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

v3-hotfix-1.screencast-o-matic.com

16 ms

v3-hotfix-1.screencast-o-matic.com

41 ms

v3-hotfix-1.screenpal.com

1377 ms

gtm.js

65 ms

2912459b75f786d5043c773a5c9ea2f4.css

29 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original V3-hotfix-1.screencast-o-matic.com, 37% (23 requests) were made to D3but52g8hjy3q.cloudfront.net and 30% (19 requests) were made to V3-hotfix-1.screenpal.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source V3-hotfix-1.screenpal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 493.9 kB (67%)

Content Size

736.3 kB

After Optimization

242.4 kB

In fact, the total size of V3-hotfix-1.screencast-o-matic.com main page is 736.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 453.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 384.1 kB

  • Original 453.6 kB
  • After minification 394.1 kB
  • After compression 69.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 59.5 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 384.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 617 B

  • Original 1.6 kB
  • After minification 987 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, V 3 Hotfix 1 Screencast O Matic needs image optimization as it can save up to 617 B or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 107.0 kB

  • Original 217.5 kB
  • After minification 217.2 kB
  • After compression 110.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 107.0 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 63.6 kB
  • After minification 63.3 kB
  • After compression 61.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. V3-hotfix-1.screencast-o-matic.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (70%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of V 3 Hotfix 1 Screencast O Matic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

v3-hotfix-1.screencast-o-matic.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

v3-hotfix-1.screencast-o-matic.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

v3-hotfix-1.screencast-o-matic.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise V3-hotfix-1.screencast-o-matic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that V3-hotfix-1.screencast-o-matic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of V 3 Hotfix 1 Screencast O Matic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: