Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

v3-test-1.screencast-o-matic.com

ScreenPal (Formerly Screencast-O-Matic) | Screen Recorder & Video Editor

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

25 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

3.8 sec

v3-test-1.screencast-o-matic.com screenshot

About Website

Visit v3-test-1.screencast-o-matic.com now to see the best up-to-date V 3 Test 1 Screencast O Matic content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about v3-test-1.screencast-o-matic.com

At ScreenPal, we don’t believe that video recording and editing should be difficult, or cost a fortune. Our simple and intuitive tools help you get the job done easily.

Visit v3-test-1.screencast-o-matic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed V3-test-1.screencast-o-matic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 25 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

v3-test-1.screencast-o-matic.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,420 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.157

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

v3-test-1.screencast-o-matic.com

25 ms

v3-test-1.screencast-o-matic.com

51 ms

v3-test-1.screenpal.com

670 ms

gtm.js

86 ms

d86dccf5fe2df9ad995ca61711906813.css

37 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original V3-test-1.screencast-o-matic.com, 39% (24 requests) were made to D1u7q4qtirt80f.cloudfront.net and 31% (19 requests) were made to V3-test-1.screenpal.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (672 ms) relates to the external source Chart.googleapis.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (79%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

358.1 kB

In fact, the total size of V3-test-1.screencast-o-matic.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 142.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 650 B

  • Original 1.6 kB
  • After minification 987 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, V 3 Test 1 Screencast O Matic needs image optimization as it can save up to 650 B or 40% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 107.0 kB

  • Original 265.0 kB
  • After minification 264.6 kB
  • After compression 158.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 107.0 kB or 40% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 64.0 kB
  • After minification 63.0 kB
  • After compression 56.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. V3-test-1.screencast-o-matic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.1 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (73%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of V 3 Test 1 Screencast O Matic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

v3-test-1.screencast-o-matic.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

v3-test-1.screencast-o-matic.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

v3-test-1.screencast-o-matic.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise V3-test-1.screencast-o-matic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that V3-test-1.screencast-o-matic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of V 3 Test 1 Screencast O Matic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: