Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

v3-test-12.screencast-o-matic.com

ScreenPal (Formerly Screencast-O-Matic) | Screen Recorder & Video Editor

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

17 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

612 ms

v3-test-12.screencast-o-matic.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing V 3 Test 12 Screencast O Matic content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about v3-test-12.screencast-o-matic.com

At ScreenPal, we don’t believe that video recording and editing should be difficult, or cost a fortune. Our simple and intuitive tools help you get the job done easily.

Visit v3-test-12.screencast-o-matic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed V3-test-12.screencast-o-matic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 17 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

v3-test-12.screencast-o-matic.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.592

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

v3-test-12.screencast-o-matic.com

17 ms

v3-test-12.screencast-o-matic.com

24 ms

v3-test-12.screenpal.com

1172 ms

gtm.js

105 ms

27380b9803fe148c3dd6be5533c02fd9.css

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original V3-test-12.screencast-o-matic.com, 38% (20 requests) were made to V3-test-12.screenpal.com and 30% (16 requests) were made to D2jaxercbrfwhj.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source V3-test-12.screenpal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 495.7 kB (71%)

Content Size

697.9 kB

After Optimization

202.2 kB

In fact, the total size of V3-test-12.screencast-o-matic.com main page is 697.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 467.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 387.1 kB

  • Original 467.1 kB
  • After minification 420.2 kB
  • After compression 80.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 387.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 106.9 kB

  • Original 212.2 kB
  • After minification 211.9 kB
  • After compression 105.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 106.9 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 18.6 kB
  • After minification 18.6 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. V3-test-12.screencast-o-matic.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (37%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of V 3 Test 12 Screencast O Matic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

v3-test-12.screencast-o-matic.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

v3-test-12.screencast-o-matic.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

v3-test-12.screencast-o-matic.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise V3-test-12.screencast-o-matic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that V3-test-12.screencast-o-matic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of V 3 Test 12 Screencast O Matic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: