Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 52

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

woodbridge.suffolk.sch.uk

Default Web Site Page

Page Load Speed

12.7 sec in total

First Response

388 ms

Resources Loaded

12 sec

Page Rendered

354 ms

woodbridge.suffolk.sch.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit woodbridge.suffolk.sch.uk now to see the best up-to-date Woodbridge Suffolk content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about woodbridge.suffolk.sch.uk

One of the top Co-educational Independent day and boarding Schools in Suffolk and East Anglia for ages 4-18.

Visit woodbridge.suffolk.sch.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Woodbridge.suffolk.sch.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 388 ms and then it took 12.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

woodbridge.suffolk.sch.uk performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.096

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.woodbridge.suffolk.sch.uk

388 ms

css

25 ms

style-responsive.css

175 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

194 ms

style.css

195 ms

Our browser made a total of 141 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (100 requests) were addressed to the original Woodbridge.suffolk.sch.uk, 3% (4 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to I1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Woodbridge.suffolk.sch.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (74%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

681.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Woodbridge.suffolk.sch.uk main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 125.7 kB

  • Original 145.7 kB
  • After minification 135.4 kB
  • After compression 20.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 29.2 kB
  • After minification 25.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Woodbridge Suffolk needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.0 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB
  • After compression 518.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 645.7 kB

  • Original 763.6 kB
  • After minification 705.0 kB
  • After compression 117.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Woodbridge.suffolk.sch.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 645.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 81 (63%)

Requests Now

128

After Optimization

47

The browser has sent 128 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Woodbridge Suffolk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

woodbridge.suffolk.sch.uk accessibility score

52

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

woodbridge.suffolk.sch.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

woodbridge.suffolk.sch.uk SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Woodbridge.suffolk.sch.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Woodbridge.suffolk.sch.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Woodbridge Suffolk. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: