Tools & Wizards About Us
wrapper.scout.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 3

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 58

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 25% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

wrapper.scout.com

Scout.com - College Sports, Football Recruiting, NFL, Fantasy Advice & More

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

197 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

809 ms

wrapper.scout.com screenshot

About Website

Visit wrapper.scout.com now to see the best up-to-date Wrapper Scout content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wrapper.scout.com

Breaking news and expert analysis on college sports, recruiting, fantasy football, NFL, outdoors, military, and more.

Visit wrapper.scout.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wrapper.scout.com page load time and found that the first response time was 197 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Wrapper.scout.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

wrapper.scout.com performance score

3

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,950 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.517

15/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value34.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wrapper.scout.com

197 ms

style.css

342 ms

global.css

359 ms

site.css

368 ms

site.css

353 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Wrapper.scout.com, 50% (8 requests) were made to S3media.247sports.com and 44% (7 requests) were made to Assets.247sports.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (460 ms) relates to the external source S3media.247sports.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 39.3 kB (37%)

Content Size

105.9 kB

After Optimization

66.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wrapper.scout.com main page is 105.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 65.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 8.3 kB
  • After minification 6.4 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.0 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 32.2 kB
  • After minification 29.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wrapper Scout images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 30.5 kB

  • Original 65.4 kB
  • After minification 65.3 kB
  • After compression 34.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wrapper.scout.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.5 kB or 47% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (44%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wrapper Scout. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wrapper.scout.com

wrapper.scout.com

197 ms

style.css

style.css

342 ms

global.css

global.css

359 ms

site.css

site.css

368 ms

site.css

site.css

353 ms

layout.css

layout.css

368 ms

menu.css

menu.css

344 ms

scout-logo-small.png

scout-logo-small.png

460 ms

247sports.png

247sports.png

241 ms

bg_oops.png

bg_oops.png

256 ms

cbsdigital-logo.png

cbsdigital-logo.png

264 ms

ProximaNova-Reg-webfont.woff

ProximaNova-Reg-webfont.woff

41 ms

ProximaNovaCond-Semibold.woff

ProximaNovaCond-Semibold.woff

90 ms

ProximaNova-Sbold-webfont.woff

ProximaNova-Sbold-webfont.woff

38 ms

ProximaNova-Bold-webfont.woff

ProximaNova-Bold-webfont.woff

88 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

88 ms

Accessibility Review

wrapper.scout.com accessibility score

58

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

wrapper.scout.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

wrapper.scout.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wrapper.scout.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wrapper.scout.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wrapper.scout.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wrapper Scout. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: