Tools & Wizards About Us
www1.shore.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

www1.shore.net

Call Center Solutions I ARC Pointe Call Center I apcallcenters.com

Page Load Speed

8.3 sec in total

First Response

622 ms

Resources Loaded

7.3 sec

Page Rendered

354 ms

www1.shore.net screenshot

About Website

Visit www1.shore.net now to see the best up-to-date Www 1 Shore content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about www1.shore.net

Call Center Solutions : Call Center or Virtual Environment , Which is best for your business needs? We do both exceptionally well.

Visit www1.shore.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Www1.shore.net page load time and found that the first response time was 622 ms and then it took 7.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

www1.shore.net performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value16.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value26.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,710 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.14

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.apcallcenters.com

622 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

43 ms

common-skeleton.min.css

39 ms

tooltip.min.css

40 ms

style.min.css

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Www1.shore.net, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (622 ms) relates to the external source Apcallcenters.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.6 MB (90%)

Content Size

3.9 MB

After Optimization

377.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Www1.shore.net main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 146.8 kB

  • Original 179.1 kB
  • After minification 175.4 kB
  • After compression 32.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 146.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-96%

Potential reduce by 2.1 MB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 75.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Www 1 Shore needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 96% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 193.4 kB

  • Original 302.4 kB
  • After minification 296.9 kB
  • After compression 109.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 193.4 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 160.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Www1.shore.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (83%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Www 1 Shore. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.apcallcenters.com

www.apcallcenters.com

622 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

43 ms

common-skeleton.min.css

common-skeleton.min.css

39 ms

tooltip.min.css

tooltip.min.css

40 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

61 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

47 ms

vendors-style.css

vendors-style.css

49 ms

style.css

style.css

66 ms

radiantthemes-gutenberg-blocks.css

radiantthemes-gutenberg-blocks.css

56 ms

styles.css

styles.css

46 ms

consultix-recent-post-with-thumbnail-element-one.css

consultix-recent-post-with-thumbnail-element-one.css

62 ms

rt-megamenu.css

rt-megamenu.css

57 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

88 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

79 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

97 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

113 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

84 ms

elusive-icons.min.css

elusive-icons.min.css

75 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

93 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

142 ms

radiantthemes-custom.css

radiantthemes-custom.css

124 ms

radiantthemes-responsive.css

radiantthemes-responsive.css

93 ms

radiantthemes-header-style-nine.css

radiantthemes-header-style-nine.css

101 ms

radiantthemes-footer-style-four.css

radiantthemes-footer-style-four.css

104 ms

radiantthemes-color-scheme-midnight-blue.css

radiantthemes-color-scheme-midnight-blue.css

106 ms

style.css

style.css

107 ms

radiantthemes-button-element-one.css

radiantthemes-button-element-one.css

108 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

186 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

120 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

212 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

252 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

130 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

132 ms

woocommerce-add-to-cart.js

woocommerce-add-to-cart.js

132 ms

retina.min.js

retina.min.js

134 ms

js

js

129 ms

css

css

70 ms

css

css

109 ms

radiantthemes-custom-button.css

radiantthemes-custom-button.css

107 ms

radiantthemes-contact-form-element-one.css

radiantthemes-contact-form-element-one.css

180 ms

radiantthemes-testimonial-element-ten.css

radiantthemes-testimonial-element-ten.css

180 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

208 ms

radiantthemes-testimonial-nav-dot-style.css

radiantthemes-testimonial-nav-dot-style.css

204 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

202 ms

rt-megamenu.js

rt-megamenu.js

203 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

202 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

196 ms

cart-fragments.min.js

cart-fragments.min.js

191 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

194 ms

jquery.sidr.min.js

jquery.sidr.min.js

191 ms

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

181 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

176 ms

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

223 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

164 ms

radiantthemes-custom.js

radiantthemes-custom.js

164 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

209 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

204 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

202 ms

radiantthemes-testimonial-element-ten.js

radiantthemes-testimonial-element-ten.js

200 ms

logo_arcpointe-1.png

logo_arcpointe-1.png

78 ms

Main-Header2.png

Main-Header2.png

86 ms

Services.png

Services.png

80 ms

Fotolia_36404760_XS.jpg

Fotolia_36404760_XS.jpg

78 ms

Industry.png

Industry.png

79 ms

AdobeStock_323187413.png

AdobeStock_323187413.png

81 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

143 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

140 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

217 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

56 ms

azul_1.png

azul_1.png

84 ms

Contact-Us_1170x5561.png

Contact-Us_1170x5561.png

161 ms

demo-eleven-background-2.jpg

demo-eleven-background-2.jpg

158 ms

collect

collect

53 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

17 ms

Accessibility Review

www1.shore.net accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

www1.shore.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

www1.shore.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Www1.shore.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Www1.shore.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

www1.shore.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Www 1 Shore. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: