Tools & Wizards About Us
apply.turing.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

apply.turing.io

Turing School of Software & Design - Student Application

Page Load Speed

948 ms in total

First Response

80 ms

Resources Loaded

771 ms

Page Rendered

97 ms

apply.turing.io screenshot

About Website

Visit apply.turing.io now to see the best up-to-date Apply Turing content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about apply.turing.io

Ready for more than a bootcamp? Apply today and learn to be a professional software developer at Turing School of Software & Design.

Visit apply.turing.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Apply.turing.io page load time and found that the first response time was 80 ms and then it took 868 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

apply.turing.io performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,210 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.6 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

apply.turing.io

80 ms

apply.turing.edu

87 ms

application-3063a210171ac9abaca9cf530b52fea777050f1c7be4f17bf73f2fa617a78e87.css

12 ms

application-781ed1d42210d42f4dbe6b886812be6efd4f9bf1d1bb0a09d14693d5955fe402.js

31 ms

lqc0crg.js

74 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Apply.turing.io, 46% (12 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 15% (4 requests) were made to Apply.turing.edu. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (519 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.segment.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 72.8 kB (18%)

Content Size

398.7 kB

After Optimization

325.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Apply.turing.io main page is 398.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 262.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 54.6 kB

  • Original 62.3 kB
  • After minification 62.0 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.6 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 17.4 kB

  • Original 46.9 kB
  • After minification 29.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Apply Turing needs image optimization as it can save up to 17.4 kB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 857 B

  • Original 262.0 kB
  • After minification 262.0 kB
  • After compression 261.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 27.5 kB
  • After minification 27.5 kB
  • After compression 27.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Apply.turing.io has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (67%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Apply Turing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

apply.turing.io

apply.turing.io

80 ms

apply.turing.edu

apply.turing.edu

87 ms

application-3063a210171ac9abaca9cf530b52fea777050f1c7be4f17bf73f2fa617a78e87.css

application-3063a210171ac9abaca9cf530b52fea777050f1c7be4f17bf73f2fa617a78e87.css

12 ms

application-781ed1d42210d42f4dbe6b886812be6efd4f9bf1d1bb0a09d14693d5955fe402.js

application-781ed1d42210d42f4dbe6b886812be6efd4f9bf1d1bb0a09d14693d5955fe402.js

31 ms

lqc0crg.js

lqc0crg.js

74 ms

LogRocket.min.js

LogRocket.min.js

64 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

48 ms

html5.js

html5.js

396 ms

api.js

api.js

51 ms

turing

turing

18 ms

analytics.min.js

analytics.min.js

519 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

321 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

19 ms

logo-gray-2bc6bdc736890907f536f2d188d7d20ffe8e8b28764bdc724867dcfb78cd1b77.png

logo-gray-2bc6bdc736890907f536f2d188d7d20ffe8e8b28764bdc724867dcfb78cd1b77.png

13 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

326 ms

d

d

24 ms

d

d

49 ms

d

d

67 ms

d

d

68 ms

d

d

69 ms

d

d

69 ms

d

d

69 ms

d

d

69 ms

d

d

69 ms

d

d

70 ms

d

d

70 ms

Accessibility Review

apply.turing.io accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

apply.turing.io best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

apply.turing.io SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Apply.turing.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Apply.turing.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

apply.turing.io

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Apply Turing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: