Tools & Wizards About Us
de.thatoneprivacysite.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

de.thatoneprivacysite.net

10 Best VPN Services (2023): Security, Features + Speed

Page Load Speed

7 sec in total

First Response

184 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

4 sec

de.thatoneprivacysite.net screenshot

About Website

Visit de.thatoneprivacysite.net now to see the best up-to-date De Thatoneprivacysite content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about de.thatoneprivacysite.net

A VPN expert compares & ranks the best VPN services on the market in 2023. Compare the top VPNs and find yours now.

Visit de.thatoneprivacysite.net

Key Findings

We analyzed De.thatoneprivacysite.net page load time and found that the first response time was 184 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

de.thatoneprivacysite.net performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

68/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

de.thatoneprivacysite.net

184 ms

247 ms

logo.svg

136 ms

NORTON-2.svg

138 ms

BITDEFENDER-1.svg

144 ms

Our browser made a total of 131 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original De.thatoneprivacysite.net, 98% (128 requests) were made to Safetydetectives.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Bat.bing.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Safetydetectives.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 870.3 kB (18%)

Content Size

4.7 MB

After Optimization

3.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of De.thatoneprivacysite.net main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 868.0 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 996.4 kB
  • After compression 160.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 868.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 3.6 MB
  • After minification 3.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. De Thatoneprivacysite images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 50.6 kB
  • After minification 50.6 kB
  • After compression 50.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6 B

  • Original 1.3 kB
  • After minification 1.3 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. De.thatoneprivacysite.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

128

After Optimization

128

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 128 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of De Thatoneprivacysite. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

de.thatoneprivacysite.net

de.thatoneprivacysite.net

184 ms

247 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

136 ms

NORTON-2.svg

NORTON-2.svg

138 ms

BITDEFENDER-1.svg

BITDEFENDER-1.svg

144 ms

TOTAL-AV.svg

TOTAL-AV.svg

151 ms

McAfee-1.svg

McAfee-1.svg

150 ms

Intego.svg

Intego.svg

147 ms

Avira.svg

Avira.svg

146 ms

1Password.svg

1Password.svg

145 ms

Dashlane-revision.svg

Dashlane-revision.svg

152 ms

Roboform.svg

Roboform.svg

155 ms

NordPass.svg

NordPass.svg

161 ms

Keeper.svg

Keeper.svg

152 ms

LastPass.svg

LastPass.svg

157 ms

ExpressVPN.svg

ExpressVPN.svg

159 ms

PrivateInternetAccess-1.svg

PrivateInternetAccess-1.svg

161 ms

CyberGhost.svg

CyberGhost.svg

168 ms

NordVPN.svg

NordVPN.svg

165 ms

Surfshark.svg

Surfshark.svg

165 ms

Private-VPN.svg

Private-VPN.svg

168 ms

Qustodio.svg

Qustodio.svg

174 ms

Norton-Family-Review.svg

Norton-Family-Review.svg

175 ms

bark-us.svg

bark-us.svg

178 ms

Famisafe.svg

Famisafe.svg

176 ms

Mobicip.svg

Mobicip.svg

342 ms

MSPY.svg

MSPY.svg

178 ms

Eric-Goldstein-128x128.png

Eric-Goldstein-128x128.png

180 ms

bat.js

bat.js

100 ms

js

js

129 ms

blog.js

blog.js

277 ms

ExpressVPN-Device-Image.svg

ExpressVPN-Device-Image.svg

117 ms

Best__VPN__Services_2.png

Best__VPN__Services_2.png

320 ms

Best-VPN_Services_3.png

Best-VPN_Services_3.png

321 ms

ExpressVPN-Streaming-1.png

ExpressVPN-Streaming-1.png

321 ms

Best-VPN_Services_5.png

Best-VPN_Services_5.png

321 ms

Best-VPN_Services_6.png

Best-VPN_Services_6.png

378 ms

Best-VPN_Services_7.png

Best-VPN_Services_7.png

375 ms

PIA-Device-Image.svg

PIA-Device-Image.svg

380 ms

Best-VPN_Services_9.png

Best-VPN_Services_9.png

377 ms

Best-VPN_Services_10.png

Best-VPN_Services_10.png

306 ms

PIA-Streaming.png

PIA-Streaming.png

308 ms

Best-VPN_Services_12.png

Best-VPN_Services_12.png

360 ms

Best-VPN_Services_13.png

Best-VPN_Services_13.png

358 ms

PIA-pricing-070324.jpg

PIA-pricing-070324.jpg

366 ms

CyberGhost-Device-Image.svg

CyberGhost-Device-Image.svg

356 ms

Best-VPN_Services_16.png

Best-VPN_Services_16.png

565 ms

Best-VPN_Services_17.png

Best-VPN_Services_17.png

352 ms

Best_VPN_Services_15.png

Best_VPN_Services_15.png

469 ms

Best-VPN_Services_19.png

Best-VPN_Services_19.png

487 ms

Best-VPN_Services_20.png

Best-VPN_Services_20.png

438 ms

CyberGhost-plans.jpg

CyberGhost-plans.jpg

508 ms

NordVPN-Device-Image.svg

NordVPN-Device-Image.svg

452 ms

Best-VPN_Services_22.png

Best-VPN_Services_22.png

532 ms

Best-VPN_Services_23.png

Best-VPN_Services_23.png

768 ms

Best_VPN_Services_20.png

Best_VPN_Services_20.png

551 ms

Best-VPN_Services_25.png

Best-VPN_Services_25.png

587 ms

Best-VPN_Services_26.png

Best-VPN_Services_26.png

621 ms

NordVPN-pricing.jpg

NordVPN-pricing.jpg

629 ms

Surfshark-Device-Image.svg

Surfshark-Device-Image.svg

556 ms

Best-VPN_Services_28.png

Best-VPN_Services_28.png

658 ms

Best-VPN_Services_29.png

Best-VPN_Services_29.png

660 ms

Best_VPN_Services_25.png

Best_VPN_Services_25.png

674 ms

Best-VPN_Services_31.png

Best-VPN_Services_31.png

706 ms

Best-VPN_Services_32.png

Best-VPN_Services_32.png

721 ms

Surshark-pricing.jpg

Surshark-pricing.jpg

815 ms

PrivateVPN-Device-Image.svg

PrivateVPN-Device-Image.svg

627 ms

Best-VPN_Services_36.png

Best-VPN_Services_36.png

615 ms

PrivateVPN-Streaming.png

PrivateVPN-Streaming.png

613 ms

Best-VPN_Services_37.png

Best-VPN_Services_37.png

614 ms

Best-VPN_Services_38.png

Best-VPN_Services_38.png

651 ms

Best_VPN__Services__39.png

Best_VPN__Services__39.png

667 ms

Proton-VPN.svg

Proton-VPN.svg

645 ms

Proton-VPN-Device-Image.svg

Proton-VPN-Device-Image.svg

657 ms

Best_VPN__Services__40.png

Best_VPN__Services__40.png

666 ms

Best-VPN_Services_41.png

Best-VPN_Services_41.png

664 ms

Best_VPN_Services_34.png

Best_VPN_Services_34.png

673 ms

sdfont.woff

sdfont.woff

910 ms

deferred.css

deferred.css

687 ms

admin-ajax.php

admin-ajax.php

760 ms

Best-VPN_Services_43.png

Best-VPN_Services_43.png

742 ms

Best-VPN_Services_44.png

Best-VPN_Services_44.png

721 ms

Best__VPN__Services__45.png

Best__VPN__Services__45.png

817 ms

TunnelBear.svg

TunnelBear.svg

688 ms

TunnelBear-Device-Image.svg

TunnelBear-Device-Image.svg

681 ms

Best-VPN_Services_46.png

Best-VPN_Services_46.png

724 ms

Best_VPN_Services_38.png

Best_VPN_Services_38.png

712 ms

Best-VPN_Services_48.png

Best-VPN_Services_48.png

764 ms

Best__VPN__Services_49.png

Best__VPN__Services_49.png

788 ms

Best-VPN_Services_50.png

Best-VPN_Services_50.png

719 ms

vyprVPN.svg

vyprVPN.svg

764 ms

VyprVPN-Device-Image.svg

VyprVPN-Device-Image.svg

933 ms

Best-VPN_Services_51.png

Best-VPN_Services_51.png

766 ms

VyprVPN-Streaming.png

VyprVPN-Streaming.png

738 ms

Best-VPN_Services_53.png

Best-VPN_Services_53.png

713 ms

Best-VPN_Services_54.png

Best-VPN_Services_54.png

696 ms

Best-VPN_Services_55.png

Best-VPN_Services_55.png

731 ms

IPVANISH.svg

IPVANISH.svg

749 ms

IPVanish-Device-Image.svg

IPVanish-Device-Image.svg

723 ms

Best_VPN__Services__56.png

Best_VPN__Services__56.png

726 ms

IPVanish-Streaming.png

IPVanish-Streaming.png

698 ms

Best-VPN_Services_58.png

Best-VPN_Services_58.png

695 ms

Best_VPN__Services__59.png

Best_VPN__Services__59.png

1445 ms

IPVanish-pricing.jpg

IPVanish-pricing.jpg

734 ms

Norton-Secure-VPN-Review-1-1.png

Norton-Secure-VPN-Review-1-1.png

727 ms

Best-VPN_Services_61.png

Best-VPN_Services_61.png

712 ms

Best-VPN_Services_62.png

Best-VPN_Services_62.png

751 ms

Best-VPN_Services_63.png

Best-VPN_Services_63.png

766 ms

Best__VPN__Services_64.png

Best__VPN__Services_64.png

723 ms

Best-VPN_Services_65.png

Best-VPN_Services_65.png

761 ms

Best-VPN-color-code-e1616182307727.png

Best-VPN-color-code-e1616182307727.png

722 ms

VPN-Comparison-color-detailed.png

VPN-Comparison-color-detailed.png

777 ms

VPN-Comparison-Chart-Infographic-Jurisdiction.png

VPN-Comparison-Chart-Infographic-Jurisdiction.png

791 ms

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-3.png

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-3.png

732 ms

VPN-Comparison-Chart-Activism.png

VPN-Comparison-Chart-Activism.png

739 ms

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-5.png

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-5.png

744 ms

Best-vpns-7374.png

Best-vpns-7374.png

792 ms

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-8.png

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-8.png

774 ms

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-9.png

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-9.png

752 ms

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-10.png

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-10.png

755 ms

Best-vpns-907.png

Best-vpns-907.png

741 ms

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-12.png

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-12.png

795 ms

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-13.png

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-13.png

735 ms

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-14.png

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-14.png

748 ms

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-15.png

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-15.png

785 ms

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-16.png

SD-VPN-Comparison-Table-Term-Explanations-INFOGRAPHIC-16.png

707 ms

expressvpn.svg

expressvpn.svg

675 ms

cyberghost.svg

cyberghost.svg

649 ms

logo_vertical.svg

logo_vertical.svg

654 ms

flags.png

flags.png

727 ms

cyberghost-desktop.svg

cyberghost-desktop.svg

730 ms

Accessibility Review

de.thatoneprivacysite.net accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

de.thatoneprivacysite.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

de.thatoneprivacysite.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise De.thatoneprivacysite.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that De.thatoneprivacysite.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

de.thatoneprivacysite.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of De Thatoneprivacysite. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: