4.1 sec in total
1.2 sec
2.7 sec
182 ms
Welcome to group.trip.com homepage info - get ready to check Group Trip best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about group.trip.com
Trip.com Group is a leading global travel service provider comprising of Trip.com, Ctrip, Skyscanner, and Qunar. Across its platforms, Trip.com Group helps travellers around the world make informed an...
Visit group.trip.comWe analyzed Group.trip.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
group.trip.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value4.3 s
75/100
10%
Value1,150 ms
22/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.3 s
73/100
10%
1170 ms
102 ms
382 ms
548 ms
410 ms
Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Group.trip.com, 56% (9 requests) were made to Aw-s.tripcdn.com and 31% (5 requests) were made to Pages.trip.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Aw-s.tripcdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 68.4 kB (5%)
1.4 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Group.trip.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Group Trip images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 946 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Group.trip.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (31%)
13
9
The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Group Trip. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
group.trip.com
1170 ms
groupHome.76f4b03d512df8107e710c61e56bed35.css
102 ms
trip-intl.png
382 ms
ubt.minh.js
548 ms
trip-doms.png
410 ms
skyscanner.png
497 ms
qunar.png
402 ms
polyfill.js
1350 ms
vendor.2b492fe04767712d0e5b4b2364c74f5b.js
8 ms
en-US.js
8 ms
main-bg-1.jpg
345 ms
f9d9952b5fd3b5edfe2aadf4d0986515.f9d9952b5fd3b5edfe2aadf4d0986515.png
17 ms
33d45dee63e700fb7d1884d78652f59a.33d45dee63e700fb7d1884d78652f59a.png
16 ms
4d457dfada21534c9a36c1459815b83b.4d457dfada21534c9a36c1459815b83b.woff
1272 ms
594ab91e6df6961de7d30ba45a78e9cb.594ab91e6df6961de7d30ba45a78e9cb.woff
320 ms
groupHome.94c03de7c680ecd6e3c0a8053c80fce7.js
6 ms
group.trip.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
group.trip.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
group.trip.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Group.trip.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Group.trip.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
group.trip.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Group Trip. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: